Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QBNAX vs SSGSX
QBNAX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts QBNAX vs SSGSX
Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Instl
Price$36.84
Change-$0.03 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.97B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change+$0.08 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
QBNAX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QBNAX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QBNAX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. QBNAX (2.97B). QBNAX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: QBNAX (1.01) vs SSGSX (0.47). QBNAX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: QBNAX (33 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) and QBNAX (1.20) have similar cost to investors . QBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than QBNAX: SSGSX (2500) vs QBNAX (1000000). QBNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.82 vs. SSGSX (-1.56). QBNAX return over 5 years is better than : 65.26 vs. SSGSX (22.95).
| QBNAX | SSGSX | QBNAX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.26 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.26 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.909 | 2.046 | 387% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.97B | 5.64B | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 0.47 | 213% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.82 | -1.56 | -501% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.63 | 3.97 | 771% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.26 | 22.95 | 284% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.47 | 24.71 | 204% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement