QBIEY
Price
$13.36
Change
+$0.02 (+0.15%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
19.96B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TKOMY
Price
$37.07
Change
-$0.13 (-0.35%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
70.71B
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QBIEY vs TKOMY

Header iconQBIEY vs TKOMY Comparison
Open Charts QBIEY vs TKOMYBanner chart's image
QBE Insurance Group
Price$13.36
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
Volume$34.9K
Capitalization19.96B
Tokio Marine Holdings
Price$37.07
Change-$0.13 (-0.35%)
Volume$127.99K
Capitalization70.71B
QBIEY vs TKOMY Comparison Chart in %
QBIEY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TKOMY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QBIEY vs. TKOMY commentary
Dec 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QBIEY is a Hold and TKOMY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 28, 2025
Stock price -- (QBIEY: $13.36 vs. TKOMY: $37.07)
Brand notoriety: QBIEY and TKOMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QBIEY: 34% vs. TKOMY: 54%
Market capitalization -- QBIEY: $19.96B vs. TKOMY: $70.71B
QBIEY [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $19.96B. TKOMY’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $70.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $133.14B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $18.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QBIEY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTKOMY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • QBIEY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TKOMY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TKOMY is a better buy in the long-term than QBIEY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QBIEY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TKOMY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QBIEY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TKOMY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TKOMY is a better buy in the short-term than QBIEY.

Price Growth

QBIEY (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +1.40% price change this week, while TKOMY (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -2.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

TKOMY is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.32% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TKOMY($70.7B) has a higher market cap than QBIEY($20B). TKOMY (10.53) and QBIEY (10.06) have similar P/E ratio . QBIEY YTD gains are higher at: 17.846 vs. TKOMY (2.915). QBIEY has less debt than TKOMY: QBIEY (2.9B) vs TKOMY (225B). TKOMY has higher revenues than QBIEY: TKOMY (7.47T) vs QBIEY (19.2B).
QBIEYTKOMYQBIEY / TKOMY
Capitalization20B70.7B28%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.8462.915612%
P/E Ratio10.0610.5396%
Revenue19.2B7.47T0%
Total CashN/A1.01T-
Total Debt2.9B225B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QBIEY vs TKOMY: Fundamental Ratings
QBIEY
TKOMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1624
SMR RATING
1..100
92100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5660
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5434
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QBIEY's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as TKOMY (50). This means that QBIEY’s stock grew similarly to TKOMY’s over the last 12 months.

QBIEY's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as TKOMY (24). This means that QBIEY’s stock grew similarly to TKOMY’s over the last 12 months.

QBIEY's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as TKOMY (100). This means that QBIEY’s stock grew similarly to TKOMY’s over the last 12 months.

QBIEY's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as TKOMY (60). This means that QBIEY’s stock grew similarly to TKOMY’s over the last 12 months.

TKOMY's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as QBIEY (54). This means that TKOMY’s stock grew similarly to QBIEY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QBIEYTKOMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QBIEY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TKOMY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLOT50.830.02
+0.03%
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
TAPR25.93N/A
N/A
Innovator Eq Dfnd Prt ETF-2 Yr toApr2027
PSFM31.80N/A
N/A
Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF
FDMO85.37-0.26
-0.30%
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
NAZ11.90-0.04
-0.34%
Nuveen Arizona Quality Municipal Income Fund

QBIEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QBIEY and BNT have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QBIEY and BNT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QBIEY
1D Price
Change %
QBIEY100%
+0.15%
BNT - QBIEY
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
SMPNY - QBIEY
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
TKOMY - QBIEY
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
STC - QBIEY
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
DGICB - QBIEY
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.18%
More

TKOMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TKOMY has been closely correlated with MSADY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TKOMY jumps, then MSADY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TKOMY
1D Price
Change %
TKOMY100%
-0.35%
MSADY - TKOMY
75%
Closely correlated
-1.65%
SMPNY - TKOMY
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
BNT - TKOMY
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
TKOMF - TKOMY
32%
Poorly correlated
+4.41%
MSADF - TKOMY
28%
Poorly correlated
-7.38%
More