Advertisement
QBIEY vs QUCOF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QBIEY is a Hold and QUCOF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QBIEY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileQUCOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- QBIEY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- QUCOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QBIEY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QUCOF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- QBIEY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- QUCOF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
QBIEY (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +1.40% price change this week, while QUCOF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +0.69% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.03%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.32% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| QBIEY | QUCOF | QBIEY / QUCOF | |
| Capitalization | 20B | 4.18B | 479% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.846 | 45.804 | 39% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.06 | 10.95 | 92% |
| Revenue | 19.2B | 79.1B | 24% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 2.96B | - |
| Total Debt | 2.9B | N/A | - |
QBIEY | QUCOF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 21 Undervalued | 23 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 37 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 21 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 55 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
QBIEY's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as QUCOF (23). This means that QBIEY’s stock grew similarly to QUCOF’s over the last 12 months.
QBIEY's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as QUCOF (37). This means that QBIEY’s stock grew similarly to QUCOF’s over the last 12 months.
QUCOF's SMR Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for QBIEY (92). This means that QUCOF’s stock grew significantly faster than QBIEY’s over the last 12 months.
QUCOF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as QBIEY (56). This means that QUCOF’s stock grew similarly to QBIEY’s over the last 12 months.
QBIEY's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as QUCOF (55). This means that QBIEY’s stock grew similarly to QUCOF’s over the last 12 months.
| QBIEY | QUCOF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 17% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 7% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 20% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 19% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 73% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 58% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 32% |
Advertisement
QBIEY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that QBIEY and BNT have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QBIEY and BNT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QBIEY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QBIEY | 100% | +0.15% | ||
| BNT - QBIEY | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.30% | ||
| SMPNY - QBIEY | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.47% | ||
| TKOMY - QBIEY | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.35% | ||
| STC - QBIEY | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.99% | ||
| DGICB - QBIEY | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.18% | ||
More | ||||
QUCOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QUCOF has been loosely correlated with LMND. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QUCOF jumps, then LMND could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QUCOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUCOF | 100% | N/A | ||
| LMND - QUCOF | 37% Loosely correlated | -6.40% | ||
| PLMR - QUCOF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.91% | ||
| QBIEY - QUCOF | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.15% | ||
| QBEIF - QUCOF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PZAKY - QUCOF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||