Advertisement
QBCRF vs TU
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QBCRF is a Hold and TU is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QBCRF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- QBCRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QBCRF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TU’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- QBCRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- TU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
QBCRF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -5.63% price change this week, while TU (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +3.19% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.57%.
Reported Earning Dates
TU is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Telecommunications (+0.51% weekly)Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
| QBCRF | TU | QBCRF / TU | |
| Capitalization | 8.15B | 21B | 39% |
| EBITDA | 2.33B | 6.75B | 35% |
| Gain YTD | -6.104 | 3.037 | -201% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.84 | 24.16 | 57% |
| Revenue | 5.63B | 20.4B | 28% |
| Total Cash | 245M | 1.83B | 13% |
| Total Debt | 7.49B | 29.9B | 25% |
QBCRF | TU | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 58 Fair valued | 8 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 52 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 26 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 20 | 80 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TU's Valuation (8) in the Major Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QBCRF (58) in the null industry. This means that TU’s stock grew somewhat faster than QBCRF’s over the last 12 months.
QBCRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TU (100) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that QBCRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TU’s over the last 12 months.
QBCRF's SMR Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TU (78) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that QBCRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TU’s over the last 12 months.
QBCRF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as TU (61) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that QBCRF’s stock grew similarly to TU’s over the last 12 months.
QBCRF's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TU (80) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that QBCRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TU’s over the last 12 months.
| QBCRF | TU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 47% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 38% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 42% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 43% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 39% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 42% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 11 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 51% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 51% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NCIQ | 25.59 | 0.87 | +3.51% |
| Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF | |||
| DFAW | 76.11 | 0.07 | +0.09% |
| Dimensional World Equity ETF | |||
| PSCJ | 30.30 | N/A | N/A |
| Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (July) ETF | |||
| ZSEP | 26.84 | -0.02 | -0.07% |
| Innovator Equity Defined Prot ETF-1YrSep | |||
| MSFU | 37.27 | -1.84 | -4.70% |
| Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares | |||
QBCRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QBCRF has been loosely correlated with BCE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QBCRF jumps, then BCE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QBCRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QBCRF | 100% | -1.56% | ||
| BCE - QBCRF | 35% Loosely correlated | +2.11% | ||
| RCI - QBCRF | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.21% | ||
| DTEGY - QBCRF | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.32% | ||
| TU - QBCRF | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.72% | ||
| VZ - QBCRF | 23% Poorly correlated | +2.10% | ||
More | ||||
TU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TU has been loosely correlated with BCE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TU jumps, then BCE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TU | 100% | +1.72% | ||
| BCE - TU | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.11% | ||
| DTEGY - TU | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| TLSNY - TU | 32% Poorly correlated | +3.25% | ||
| TELNY - TU | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.64% | ||
| VZ - TU | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.10% | ||
More | ||||