QBCRF
Price
$30.76
Change
+$0.24 (+0.79%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
7.06B
SMNUF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Capitalization
2.09B
Interact to see
Advertisement

QBCRF vs SMNUF

Header iconQBCRF vs SMNUF Comparison
Open Charts QBCRF vs SMNUFBanner chart's image
Quebecor
Price$30.76
Change+$0.24 (+0.79%)
Volume$712
Capitalization7.06B
Pt Sarana Menara Nusantara, Tbk
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization2.09B
QBCRF vs SMNUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
QBCRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMNUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QBCRF vs. SMNUF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QBCRF is a Hold and SMNUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (QBCRF: $30.76 vs. SMNUF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: QBCRF and SMNUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QBCRF: 1% vs. SMNUF: 208%
Market capitalization -- QBCRF: $7.06B vs. SMNUF: $2.09B
QBCRF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $7.06B. SMNUF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $2.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $267.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QBCRF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSMNUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • QBCRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SMNUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMNUF is a better buy in the long-term than QBCRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QBCRF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMNUF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QBCRF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SMNUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QBCRF is a better buy in the short-term than SMNUF.

Price Growth

QBCRF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -0.84% price change this week, while SMNUF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.70%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+0.03% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QBCRF($7.06B) has a higher market cap than SMNUF($2.09B). QBCRF has higher P/E ratio than SMNUF: QBCRF (12.80) vs SMNUF (9.33). QBCRF YTD gains are higher at: 39.438 vs. SMNUF (-18.715). SMNUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.69T vs. QBCRF (2.3B). SMNUF has more cash in the bank: 824B vs. QBCRF (21M). QBCRF has less debt than SMNUF: QBCRF (7.48B) vs SMNUF (50.78T). SMNUF has higher revenues than QBCRF: SMNUF (12.98T) vs QBCRF (5.61B).
QBCRFSMNUFQBCRF / SMNUF
Capitalization7.06B2.09B338%
EBITDA2.3B6.69T0%
Gain YTD39.438-18.715-211%
P/E Ratio12.809.33137%
Revenue5.61B12.98T0%
Total Cash21M824B0%
Total Debt7.48B50.78T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QBCRF vs SMNUF: Fundamental Ratings
QBCRF
SMNUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
69100
SMR RATING
1..100
2818
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4938
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3038
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMNUF's Valuation (52) in the null industry is in the same range as QBCRF (72). This means that SMNUF’s stock grew similarly to QBCRF’s over the last 12 months.

QBCRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as SMNUF (100). This means that QBCRF’s stock grew similarly to SMNUF’s over the last 12 months.

SMNUF's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as QBCRF (28). This means that SMNUF’s stock grew similarly to QBCRF’s over the last 12 months.

SMNUF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as QBCRF (49). This means that SMNUF’s stock grew similarly to QBCRF’s over the last 12 months.

QBCRF's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as SMNUF (38). This means that QBCRF’s stock grew similarly to SMNUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QBCRFSMNUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
57%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
55%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QBCRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMNUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EPSB22.651.58
+7.47%
Harbor Smid Cap Core ETF
NERD27.970.46
+1.69%
Roundhill Video Games ETF
XSVM56.730.55
+0.98%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momt ETF
SMIZ37.320.33
+0.89%
Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF
JMBS45.58-0.07
-0.15%
Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Sec ETF

QBCRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QBCRF and DTEGY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QBCRF and DTEGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QBCRF
1D Price
Change %
QBCRF100%
N/A
DTEGY - QBCRF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
RCIAF - QBCRF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SFBQF - QBCRF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.96%
PCCWY - QBCRF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
SCMWY - QBCRF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
More

SMNUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMNUF has been loosely correlated with TCMFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMNUF jumps, then TCMFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMNUF
1D Price
Change %
SMNUF100%
N/A
TCMFF - SMNUF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SFTBF - SMNUF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SFTBY - SMNUF
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.73%
SWZCF - SMNUF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QBCRF - SMNUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More