Advertisement
QBCRF vs SCMWY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QBCRF is a Hold and SCMWY is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QBCRF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSCMWY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- QBCRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SCMWY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QBCRF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCMWY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- QBCRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SCMWY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
QBCRF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а +0.98% price change this week, while SCMWY (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was +2.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +2.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +45.87%.
Reported Earning Dates
SCMWY is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Wireless Telecommunications (+2.01% weekly)Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.
| QBCRF | SCMWY | QBCRF / SCMWY | |
| Capitalization | 5.65B | 33.4B | 17% |
| EBITDA | 1.88B | 4.43B | 43% |
| Gain YTD | 32.842 | 33.667 | 98% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.85 | 18.15 | 71% |
| Revenue | 4.56B | 11.1B | 41% |
| Total Cash | 5.9M | 581M | 1% |
| Total Debt | 6.36B | 1.89B | 337% |
QBCRF | SCMWY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 60 Fair valued | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 19 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 26 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
QBCRF's Valuation (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCMWY (98). This means that QBCRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCMWY’s over the last 12 months.
SCMWY's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QBCRF (54). This means that SCMWY’s stock grew somewhat faster than QBCRF’s over the last 12 months.
QBCRF's SMR Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCMWY (63). This means that QBCRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCMWY’s over the last 12 months.
QBCRF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as SCMWY (47). This means that QBCRF’s stock grew similarly to SCMWY’s over the last 12 months.
QBCRF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as SCMWY (28). This means that QBCRF’s stock grew similarly to SCMWY’s over the last 12 months.
| QBCRF | SCMWY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 29% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 37% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 45% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 45% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 44% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 55% | 24 days ago 35% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 28% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 50% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FLRN | 30.85 | 0.03 | +0.10% |
| SPDR® Blmbg Inv Grd Flt Rt ETF | |||
| QCOC | 21.51 | 0.02 | +0.09% |
| FT Vest Nasdaq-100® Cnsrv Buffr ETF -Oct | |||
| JANJ | 24.78 | 0.02 | +0.08% |
| Innovator Premium Income 30 Bar ETF -Jan | |||
| FYLD | 30.33 | -0.12 | -0.41% |
| Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | |||
| DVAL | 14.45 | -0.08 | -0.53% |
| BrandywineGLOBAL Dyn US Lrg Cap Val ETF | |||
QBCRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that QBCRF and DTEGY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QBCRF and DTEGY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QBCRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QBCRF | 100% | -0.63% | ||
| DTEGY - QBCRF | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.85% | ||
| RCIAF - QBCRF | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SFBQF - QBCRF | 5% Poorly correlated | -2.98% | ||
| PCCWY - QBCRF | 5% Poorly correlated | -4.10% | ||
| SCMWY - QBCRF | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.25% | ||
More | ||||
SCMWY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCMWY has been loosely correlated with SWZCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCMWY jumps, then SWZCF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCMWY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCMWY | 100% | +0.25% | ||
| SWZCF - SCMWY | 46% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DTEGY - SCMWY | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.85% | ||
| KDDIY - SCMWY | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.88% | ||
| TELNY - SCMWY | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.46% | ||
| PTXKY - SCMWY | 8% Poorly correlated | -17.03% | ||
More | ||||