QBCRF
Price
$30.76
Change
+$0.24 (+0.79%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
7.06B
SCMWY
Price
$72.70
Change
-$0.02 (-0.03%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
37.58B
38 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

QBCRF vs SCMWY

Header iconQBCRF vs SCMWY Comparison
Open Charts QBCRF vs SCMWYBanner chart's image
Quebecor
Price$30.76
Change+$0.24 (+0.79%)
Volume$712
Capitalization7.06B
Swisscom AG
Price$72.70
Change-$0.02 (-0.03%)
Volume$9.55K
Capitalization37.58B
QBCRF vs SCMWY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
QBCRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCMWY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QBCRF vs. SCMWY commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QBCRF is a Hold and SCMWY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (QBCRF: $30.76 vs. SCMWY: $72.70)
Brand notoriety: QBCRF and SCMWY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QBCRF: 1% vs. SCMWY: 96%
Market capitalization -- QBCRF: $7.06B vs. SCMWY: $37.58B
QBCRF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $7.06B. SCMWY’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $37.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $267.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QBCRF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSCMWY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • QBCRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SCMWY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, QBCRF is a better buy in the long-term than SCMWY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QBCRF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCMWY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QBCRF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SCMWY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QBCRF is a better buy in the short-term than SCMWY.

Price Growth

QBCRF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -0.84% price change this week, while SCMWY (@Major Telecommunications) price change was -0.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

SCMWY is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+0.03% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCMWY($37.6B) has a higher market cap than QBCRF($7.06B). SCMWY has higher P/E ratio than QBCRF: SCMWY (22.48) vs QBCRF (12.80). QBCRF YTD gains are higher at: 39.438 vs. SCMWY (35.248). SCMWY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.27B vs. QBCRF (2.3B). SCMWY has more cash in the bank: 200M vs. QBCRF (21M). SCMWY has less debt than QBCRF: SCMWY (3.73B) vs QBCRF (7.48B). SCMWY has higher revenues than QBCRF: SCMWY (13B) vs QBCRF (5.61B).
QBCRFSCMWYQBCRF / SCMWY
Capitalization7.06B37.6B19%
EBITDA2.3B5.27B44%
Gain YTD39.43835.248112%
P/E Ratio12.8022.4857%
Revenue5.61B13B43%
Total Cash21M200M11%
Total Debt7.48B3.73B200%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QBCRF vs SCMWY: Fundamental Ratings
QBCRF
SCMWY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6924
SMR RATING
1..100
2865
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4951
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3019
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QBCRF's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as SCMWY (97). This means that QBCRF’s stock grew similarly to SCMWY’s over the last 12 months.

SCMWY's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QBCRF (69). This means that SCMWY’s stock grew somewhat faster than QBCRF’s over the last 12 months.

QBCRF's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCMWY (65). This means that QBCRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCMWY’s over the last 12 months.

QBCRF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as SCMWY (51). This means that QBCRF’s stock grew similarly to SCMWY’s over the last 12 months.

SCMWY's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as QBCRF (30). This means that SCMWY’s stock grew similarly to QBCRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QBCRFSCMWY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
19%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
21%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
34%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
25%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QBCRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCMWY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IJS110.271.31
+1.20%
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
LODI25.340.02
+0.07%
AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF
EDF5.12N/A
N/A
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund
IFEB29.34N/A
N/A
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF - Feb
ILTB50.29N/A
-0.01%
iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF

QBCRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QBCRF and DTEGY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QBCRF and DTEGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QBCRF
1D Price
Change %
QBCRF100%
N/A
DTEGY - QBCRF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
RCIAF - QBCRF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SFBQF - QBCRF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.96%
PCCWY - QBCRF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
SCMWY - QBCRF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
More

SCMWY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCMWY has been loosely correlated with SWZCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCMWY jumps, then SWZCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCMWY
1D Price
Change %
SCMWY100%
-0.03%
SWZCF - SCMWY
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DTEGY - SCMWY
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
KDDIY - SCMWY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
TELNY - SCMWY
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.16%
PTXKY - SCMWY
8%
Poorly correlated
-14.55%
More