QBCRF
Price
$30.27
Change
+$0.80 (+2.71%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
5.65B
RCIAF
Price
$30.03
Change
+$0.43 (+1.45%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Capitalization
23.22B
Interact to see
Advertisement

QBCRF vs RCIAF

Header iconQBCRF vs RCIAF Comparison
Open Charts QBCRF vs RCIAFBanner chart's image
Quebecor
Price$30.27
Change+$0.80 (+2.71%)
Volume$76.12K
Capitalization5.65B
Rogers Communications
Price$30.03
Change+$0.43 (+1.45%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization23.22B
QBCRF vs RCIAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
QBCRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RCIAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QBCRF vs. RCIAF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QBCRF is a Hold and RCIAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (QBCRF: $30.27 vs. RCIAF: $30.03)
Brand notoriety: QBCRF and RCIAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QBCRF: 131% vs. RCIAF: 204%
Market capitalization -- QBCRF: $5.65B vs. RCIAF: $23.22B
QBCRF [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $5.65B. RCIAF’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $23.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QBCRF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRCIAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • QBCRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RCIAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, QBCRF is a better buy in the long-term than RCIAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QBCRF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RCIAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QBCRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RCIAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RCIAF is a better buy in the short-term than QBCRF.

Price Growth

QBCRF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а +0.46% price change this week, while RCIAF (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.57%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+1.70% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCIAF($23.2B) has a higher market cap than QBCRF($5.65B). RCIAF has higher P/E ratio than QBCRF: RCIAF (20.96) vs QBCRF (12.85). QBCRF YTD gains are higher at: 37.217 vs. RCIAF (-9.000). RCIAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.55B vs. QBCRF (1.88B). RCIAF has more cash in the bank: 359M vs. QBCRF (5.9M). QBCRF has less debt than RCIAF: QBCRF (6.36B) vs RCIAF (46.2B). RCIAF has higher revenues than QBCRF: RCIAF (16.8B) vs QBCRF (4.56B).
QBCRFRCIAFQBCRF / RCIAF
Capitalization5.65B23.2B24%
EBITDA1.88B6.55B29%
Gain YTD37.217-9.000-414%
P/E Ratio12.8520.9661%
Revenue4.56B16.8B27%
Total Cash5.9M359M2%
Total Debt6.36B46.2B14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QBCRF vs RCIAF: Fundamental Ratings
QBCRF
RCIAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
49100
SMR RATING
1..100
2652
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4361
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2499
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RCIAF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QBCRF (77). This means that RCIAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QBCRF’s over the last 12 months.

QBCRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RCIAF (100). This means that QBCRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RCIAF’s over the last 12 months.

QBCRF's SMR Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as RCIAF (52). This means that QBCRF’s stock grew similarly to RCIAF’s over the last 12 months.

QBCRF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as RCIAF (61). This means that QBCRF’s stock grew similarly to RCIAF’s over the last 12 months.

QBCRF's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RCIAF (99). This means that QBCRF’s stock grew significantly faster than RCIAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QBCRFRCIAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
31%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
55%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QBCRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RCIAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USMC63.000.62
+0.99%
Principal US Mega-Cap ETF
FFLG26.760.26
+0.98%
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Gr ETF
DEXC55.400.38
+0.70%
Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF
JUNT34.230.18
+0.52%
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cp Buffer10 Jun ETF
GDMA34.920.09
+0.27%
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF

QBCRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QBCRF and DTEGY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QBCRF and DTEGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QBCRF
1D Price
Change %
QBCRF100%
N/A
DTEGY - QBCRF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
RCIAF - QBCRF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SFBQF - QBCRF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.29%
PCCWY - QBCRF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCMWY - QBCRF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
More

RCIAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RCIAF has been loosely correlated with TLSNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RCIAF jumps, then TLSNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RCIAF
1D Price
Change %
RCIAF100%
N/A
TLSNF - RCIAF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BTGOF - RCIAF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QBCAF - RCIAF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QBCRF - RCIAF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMNUF - RCIAF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More