Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QABGX vs RLBFX
QABGX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts QABGX vs RLBFX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced A
Price$23.67
Change-$0.26 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets305.35M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.15
Change-$0.48 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
QABGX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QABGX vs. RLBFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QABGX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. QABGX (305M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than QABGX: RLBFX (1.97) vs QABGX (1.19). QABGX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: QABGX (20 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). QABGX (1.35) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). QABGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QABGX: RLBFX (250) vs QABGX (1500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.28 vs. QABGX (1.58). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.06 vs. QABGX (21.23).
| QABGX | RLBFX | QABGX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.29 | 462% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.29 | 466% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.771 | 16.507 | 77% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305M | 269B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 1.97 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.58 | 10.28 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.05 | 44.74 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.23 | 43.06 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.19 | 81.39 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement