Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QABGX vs RLBFX
QABGX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts QABGX vs RLBFX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced A
Price$22.29
Change-$1.37 (-5.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets318.51M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.49
Change-$0.54 (-1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
QABGX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QABGX vs. RLBFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QABGX is a StrongBuy and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. QABGX (319M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than QABGX: RLBFX (2.13) vs QABGX (1.18). QABGX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: QABGX (20 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). QABGX (1.35) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). QABGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QABGX: RLBFX (250) vs QABGX (1500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.69 vs. QABGX (3.70). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.38 vs. QABGX (10.73).
| QABGX | RLBFX | QABGX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.29 | 462% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.29 | 466% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.360 | 2.503 | 14% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 319M | 270B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 2.13 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.70 | 11.69 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.53 | 38.02 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.73 | 37.38 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.53 | 91.94 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement