Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QABGX vs RLBEX
QABGX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts QABGX vs RLBEX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced A
Price$23.67
Change-$0.26 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets305.35M
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$38.99
Change-$0.49 (-1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
QABGX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QABGX vs. RLBEX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QABGX is a Hold and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. QABGX (305M). RLBEX pays higher dividends than QABGX: RLBEX (1.71) vs QABGX (1.19). QABGX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: QABGX (20 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). QABGX (1.35) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). QABGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than QABGX: RLBEX (250) vs QABGX (1500). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.94 vs. QABGX (1.58). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 41.28 vs. QABGX (21.23).
| QABGX | RLBEX | QABGX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.59 | 227% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.59 | 229% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.771 | 16.221 | 79% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305M | 269B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 1.71 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.58 | 9.94 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.05 | 43.51 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.23 | 41.28 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.19 | 80.23 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement