Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QABGX vs RLBCX
QABGX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts QABGX vs RLBCX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced A
Price$22.29
Change-$1.37 (-5.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets318.51M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.13
Change-$0.57 (-1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
QABGX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QABGX vs. RLBCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QABGX is a StrongBuy and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. QABGX (319M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than QABGX: RLBCX (1.62) vs QABGX (1.18). QABGX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: QABGX (20 years) vs RLBCX (24 years). QABGX (1.35) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). QABGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QABGX: RLBCX (250) vs QABGX (1500). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.97 vs. QABGX (3.70). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.82 vs. QABGX (10.73).
| QABGX | RLBCX | QABGX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.89 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.89 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.360 | 2.445 | 15% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 319M | 270B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 1.62 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.70 | 10.97 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.53 | 35.49 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.73 | 33.82 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.53 | 84.49 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement