Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QABGX vs RLBCX
QABGX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts QABGX vs RLBCX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced A
Price$23.67
Change-$0.26 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets305.35M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.80
Change-$0.48 (-1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
QABGX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QABGX vs. RLBCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QABGX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. QABGX (305M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than QABGX: RLBCX (1.46) vs QABGX (1.19). QABGX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: QABGX (20 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). QABGX (1.35) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). QABGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QABGX: RLBCX (250) vs QABGX (1500). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.39 vs. QABGX (1.58). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.74 vs. QABGX (21.23).
| QABGX | RLBCX | QABGX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.89 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.89 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.771 | 14.512 | 88% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305M | 269B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 1.46 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.58 | 8.39 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.05 | 41.39 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.23 | 37.74 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.19 | 70.87 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement