Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QABGX vs RLBAX
QABGX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts QABGX vs RLBAX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced A
Price$22.84
Change+$0.10 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.8M
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$36.52
Change+$0.17 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.39B
QABGX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QABGX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QABGX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. QABGX (280M). QABGX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: QABGX (1.25) vs RLBAX (1.18). QABGX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: QABGX (20 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). QABGX (1.37) and RLBAX (1.31) have similar cost to investors . QABGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than QABGX: RLBAX (250) vs QABGX (1500). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.00 vs. QABGX (4.38). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.04 vs. QABGX (26.12).
| QABGX | RLBAX | QABGX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.31 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.31 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.634 | 7.651 | 100% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 280M | 252B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 1.18 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.38 | 7.00 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.40 | 32.45 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.12 | 37.04 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.05 | 58.01 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers