Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PZVSX vs SSGSX
PZVSX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PZVSX vs SSGSX
Pzena Small Cap Value Investor
Price$13.46
Change+$0.18 (+1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.97M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.21
Change+$0.63 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.18B
PZVSX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZVSX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZVSX is a Hold and SSGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.18B vs. PZVSX (77M). PZVSX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PZVSX (1.36) vs SSGSX (0.48). PZVSX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PZVSX (10 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). PZVSX (1.74) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. PZVSX (30.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZVSX: SSGSX (2500) vs PZVSX (5000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.68 vs. PZVSX (-17.30). PZVSX return over 5 years is better than : 21.45 vs. SSGSX (4.92).
| PZVSX | SSGSX | PZVSX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.26 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.26 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.960 | 0.582 | -681% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 77M | 5.18B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 0.48 | 285% |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.30 | -13.68 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.54 | -7.65 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.45 | 4.92 | 436% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 17.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement