Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PZVSX vs SSGSX
PZVSX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PZVSX vs SSGSX
Pzena Small Cap Value Investor
Price$13.14
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.97M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.64
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.12B
PZVSX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZVSX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZVSX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.12B vs. PZVSX (77M). PZVSX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PZVSX (1.36) vs SSGSX (0.48). PZVSX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PZVSX (10 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). PZVSX (1.74) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.23). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. PZVSX (30.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZVSX: SSGSX (2500) vs PZVSX (5000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.93 vs. PZVSX (-6.34). PZVSX return over 5 years is better than : 17.43 vs. SSGSX (-0.61).
| PZVSX | SSGSX | PZVSX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.23 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.23 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.400 | -1.701 | 317% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 77M | 5.12B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 0.48 | 285% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.34 | -2.93 | 216% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.82 | 0.24 | 5,861% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.43 | -0.61 | -2,844% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 28.96 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement