Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PZVSX vs SSGSX
PZVSX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PZVSX vs SSGSX
Pzena Small Cap Value Investor
Price$14.28
Change+$0.87 (+6.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.2M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$48.32
Change+$1.94 (+4.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.04B
PZVSX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZVSX vs. SSGSX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZVSX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.04B vs. PZVSX (88.2M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than PZVSX: SSGSX (0.58) vs PZVSX (0.00). PZVSX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PZVSX (10 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). PZVSX (1.74) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.23). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. PZVSX (30.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZVSX: SSGSX (2500) vs PZVSX (5000). SSGSX (3.83) and PZVSX (3.78) have marching annual gain over last year. PZVSX return over 5 years is better than : 17.62 vs. SSGSX (-0.23).
| PZVSX | SSGSX | PZVSX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.23 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.23 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.612 | 8.123 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.2M | 5.04B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.58 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.78 | 3.83 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.18 | -3.10 | -264% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.62 | -0.23 | -7,784% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 53.01 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement