Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PZISX vs SSGSX
PZISX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PZISX vs SSGSX
Pzena Small Cap Value Institutional
Price$13.49
Change+$0.14 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.04M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.47
Change+$0.28 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.82B
PZISX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZISX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZISX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.82B vs. PZISX (48M). PZISX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PZISX (1.74) vs SSGSX (0.51). PZISX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PZISX (9 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). PZISX (1.46) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. PZISX (25.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZISX: SSGSX (2500) vs PZISX (1000000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.26 vs. PZISX (-4.37). PZISX return over 5 years is better than : 70.69 vs. SSGSX (29.33).
| PZISX | SSGSX | PZISX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.26 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.26 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.712 | -2.068 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48M | 5.82B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.74 | 0.51 | 343% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.37 | -1.26 | 346% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.89 | 2.38 | 290% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.69 | 29.33 | 241% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 16.52 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement