Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PZISX vs SSGSX
PZISX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PZISX vs SSGSX
Pzena Small Cap Value Institutional
Price$13.89
Change+$0.11 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.11M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.83
Change+$0.30 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.08B
PZISX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZISX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jan 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZISX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.08B vs. PZISX (84.1M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than PZISX: SSGSX (0.61) vs PZISX (0.07). PZISX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PZISX (10 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). PZISX (1.39) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.23). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. PZISX (30.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZISX: SSGSX (2500) vs PZISX (1000000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.18 vs. PZISX (1.45). PZISX return over 5 years is better than : 16.10 vs. SSGSX (-3.09).
| PZISX | SSGSX | PZISX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.23 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.23 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.355 | 4.789 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 84.1M | 5.08B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.61 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.45 | 2.18 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.34 | 0.65 | 2,205% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.10 | -3.09 | -521% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 45.88 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement