Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PZISX vs SSGSX
PZISX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PZISX vs SSGSX
Pzena Small Cap Value Institutional
Price$13.70
Change+$0.04 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.27M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.78
Change+$0.17 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.5B
PZISX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZISX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZISX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.5B vs. PZISX (44.3M). PZISX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PZISX (1.72) vs SSGSX (0.50). PZISX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PZISX (9 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). PZISX (1.39) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. PZISX (30.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZISX: SSGSX (2500) vs PZISX (1000000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.37 vs. PZISX (-7.03). PZISX return over 5 years is better than : 57.27 vs. SSGSX (18.02).
| PZISX | SSGSX | PZISX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.26 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.26 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.213 | -1.766 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.3M | 5.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.72 | 0.50 | 343% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.03 | -5.37 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.17 | -8.25 | -2% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.27 | 18.02 | 318% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 19.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement