Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PZISX vs SSGSX
PZISX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PZISX vs SSGSX
Pzena Small Cap Value Institutional
Price$12.99
Change-$0.02 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.71M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.80
Change-$0.57 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.23B
PZISX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZISX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZISX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.23B vs. PZISX (72.7M). PZISX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PZISX (1.69) vs SSGSX (0.49). PZISX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PZISX (10 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). PZISX (1.39) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. PZISX (30.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZISX: SSGSX (2500) vs PZISX (1000000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.62 vs. PZISX (-17.65). PZISX return over 5 years is better than : 30.28 vs. SSGSX (8.71).
| PZISX | SSGSX | PZISX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.26 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.26 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.138 | -0.129 | 5,523% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 72.7M | 5.23B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 0.49 | 348% |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.65 | -12.62 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.68 | -6.25 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.28 | 8.71 | 348% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 20.45 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement