Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PZFVX vs RMFEX
PZFVX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts PZFVX vs RMFEX
JHancock Classic Value A
Price$25.55
Change+$0.06 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets626.85M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$59.82
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
PZFVX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZFVX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZFVX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. PZFVX (627M). PZFVX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: PZFVX (2.55) vs RMFEX (1.53). PZFVX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: PZFVX (29 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). PZFVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PZFVX (29.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZFVX: RMFEX (250) vs PZFVX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.81 vs. PZFVX (-23.90). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 64.33 vs. PZFVX (16.46).
| PZFVX | RMFEX | PZFVX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.62 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.62 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.539 | 9.748 | 88% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 627M | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.55 | 1.53 | 167% |
| Returns for 1 year | -23.90 | 11.81 | -202% |
| Returns for 3 years | -25.82 | 30.45 | -85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.46 | 64.33 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.14 | 86.20 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement