Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PZFVX vs RMFEX
PZFVX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts PZFVX vs RMFEX
JHancock Classic Value A
Price$24.83
Change-$0.29 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets569.7M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.97
Change-$0.71 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
PZFVX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZFVX vs. RMFEX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZFVX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. PZFVX (570M). PZFVX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: PZFVX (2.53) vs RMFEX (1.46). PZFVX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: PZFVX (29 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). PZFVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PZFVX (29.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZFVX: RMFEX (250) vs PZFVX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.02 vs. PZFVX (-31.21). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 57.30 vs. PZFVX (-5.82).
| PZFVX | RMFEX | PZFVX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.62 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.62 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.712 | 15.396 | 44% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 570M | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.53 | 1.46 | 173% |
| Returns for 1 year | -31.21 | 7.02 | -444% |
| Returns for 3 years | -32.64 | 31.78 | -103% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.82 | 57.30 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.38 | 101.84 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers