Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PZFVX vs RMFEX
PZFVX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts PZFVX vs RMFEX
JHancock Classic Value A
Price$19.34
Change-$5.76 (-22.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets518.96M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.55
Change-$1.72 (-2.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
PZFVX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZFVX vs. RMFEX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZFVX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. PZFVX (519M). PZFVX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: PZFVX (1.86) vs RMFEX (1.50). PZFVX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: PZFVX (30 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). PZFVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX (30.00) and PZFVX (29.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZFVX: RMFEX (250) vs PZFVX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.80 vs. PZFVX (-20.44). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 46.45 vs. PZFVX (-37.24).
| PZFVX | RMFEX | PZFVX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.62 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.62 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.206 | 2.280 | -9% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 519M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 1.50 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.44 | 7.80 | -262% |
| Returns for 3 years | -41.50 | 29.96 | -139% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.24 | 46.45 | -80% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.49 | 114.19 | -0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement