Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PZFVX vs RMFEX
PZFVX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts PZFVX vs RMFEX
JHancock Classic Value A
Price$24.16
Change-$0.39 (-1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets597.79M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$57.86
Change-$0.45 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
PZFVX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZFVX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZFVX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. PZFVX (598M). PZFVX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: PZFVX (2.63) vs RMFEX (1.58). PZFVX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: PZFVX (29 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). PZFVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PZFVX (29.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZFVX: RMFEX (250) vs PZFVX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.03 vs. PZFVX (-27.73). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 62.32 vs. PZFVX (6.13).
| PZFVX | RMFEX | PZFVX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.62 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.62 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.634 | 6.152 | 43% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 598M | 106B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 1.58 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | -27.73 | 9.03 | -307% |
| Returns for 3 years | -29.83 | 29.63 | -101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.13 | 62.32 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.92 | 76.27 | -3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement