Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PZFVX vs RMFCX
PZFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PZFVX vs RMFCX
JHancock Classic Value A
Price$25.55
Change+$0.06 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets626.85M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
PZFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZFVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. PZFVX (627M). PZFVX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: PZFVX (2.55) vs RMFCX (1.27). PZFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PZFVX (29 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PZFVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PZFVX (29.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZFVX: RMFCX (250) vs PZFVX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. PZFVX (-23.90). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.83 vs. PZFVX (16.46).
| PZFVX | RMFCX | PZFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.91 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.539 | 9.596 | 89% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 627M | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.55 | 1.27 | 201% |
| Returns for 1 year | -23.90 | 11.47 | -208% |
| Returns for 3 years | -25.82 | 29.27 | -88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.46 | 61.83 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.14 | 79.21 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement