Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PZFVX vs RMFCX
PZFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PZFVX vs RMFCX
JHancock Classic Value A
Price$25.57
Change+$0.37 (+1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets566.78M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.49
Change+$0.31 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
PZFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZFVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. PZFVX (567M). PZFVX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: PZFVX (2.52) vs RMFCX (1.18). PZFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PZFVX (29 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). PZFVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PZFVX (29.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZFVX: RMFCX (250) vs PZFVX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.27 vs. PZFVX (-31.24). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.02 vs. PZFVX (-15.41).
| PZFVX | RMFCX | PZFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.91 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.624 | 15.500 | 56% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 567M | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.52 | 1.18 | 214% |
| Returns for 1 year | -31.24 | 6.27 | -498% |
| Returns for 3 years | -31.71 | 27.68 | -115% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.41 | 52.02 | -30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.90 | 90.44 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers