Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PZFVX vs RMEBX
PZFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PZFVX vs RMEBX
JHancock Classic Value A
Price$25.15
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets611.21M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.75
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.54B
PZFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZFVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. PZFVX (611M). PZFVX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: PZFVX (2.55) vs RMEBX (1.12). PZFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PZFVX (29 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). PZFVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PZFVX (29.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZFVX: RMEBX (250) vs PZFVX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.26 vs. PZFVX (-27.55). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 59.35 vs. PZFVX (8.84).
| PZFVX | RMEBX | PZFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.07 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.839 | 11.253 | 61% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 611M | 111B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.55 | 1.12 | 228% |
| Returns for 1 year | -27.55 | 11.26 | -245% |
| Returns for 3 years | -27.68 | 30.31 | -91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.84 | 59.35 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.87 | 80.17 | 6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers