Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PYVAX vs RMFCX
PYVAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PYVAX vs RMFCX
Payden Equity Income Adviser
Price$16.83
Change+$0.12 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
PYVAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PYVAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PYVAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. PYVAX (1.03B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PYVAX: RMFCX (1.27) vs PYVAX (0.86). PYVAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PYVAX (14 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PYVAX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). PYVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PYVAX: RMFCX (250) vs PYVAX (5000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. PYVAX (-5.27). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.83 vs. PYVAX (15.09).
| PYVAX | RMFCX | PYVAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.91 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.91 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.722 | 9.596 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.03B | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.27 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.27 | 11.47 | -46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.64 | 29.27 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.09 | 61.83 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.31 | 79.21 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement