Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PYVAX vs RMFCX
PYVAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PYVAX vs RMFCX
Payden Equity Income Adviser
Price$17.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.36
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
PYVAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PYVAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PYVAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. PYVAX (1.01B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PYVAX: RMFCX (1.18) vs PYVAX (0.79). PYVAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PYVAX (14 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). PYVAX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). PYVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PYVAX: RMFCX (250) vs PYVAX (5000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.94 vs. PYVAX (5.34). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 46.19 vs. PYVAX (4.22).
| PYVAX | RMFCX | PYVAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.91 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.91 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.940 | 9.715 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 1.18 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.34 | 7.94 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.82 | 28.72 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.22 | 46.19 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.51 | 90.34 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement