Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PYVAX vs RMFCX
PYVAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PYVAX vs RMFCX
Payden Equity Income Adviser
Price$16.21
Change-$0.15 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.52
Change-$0.44 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
PYVAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PYVAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PYVAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. PYVAX (1.01B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PYVAX: RMFCX (1.31) vs PYVAX (1.00). PYVAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PYVAX (14 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PYVAX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). PYVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PYVAX: RMFCX (250) vs PYVAX (5000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. PYVAX (-8.15). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.85 vs. PYVAX (11.88).
| PYVAX | RMFCX | PYVAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.91 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.91 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.606 | 6.021 | 10% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 106B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 1.31 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.15 | 8.70 | -94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.89 | 28.43 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.88 | 59.85 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.11 | 69.75 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement