Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PYVAX vs RMFCX
PYVAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PYVAX vs RMFCX
Payden Equity Income Adviser
Price$17.55
Change+$0.03 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.05B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.48
Change+$0.34 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
PYVAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PYVAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PYVAX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. PYVAX (1.06B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PYVAX: RMFCX (1.24) vs PYVAX (0.92). PYVAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PYVAX (14 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). PYVAX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). PYVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PYVAX: RMFCX (250) vs PYVAX (5000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.45 vs. PYVAX (5.71). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.16 vs. PYVAX (2.59).
| PYVAX | RMFCX | PYVAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.91 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.91 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.607 | 2.244 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 1.24 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.71 | 7.45 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.98 | 28.73 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.59 | 44.16 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.69 | 105.79 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement