Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PYVAX vs RMEBX
PYVAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PYVAX vs RMEBX
Payden Equity Income Adviser
Price$17.10
Change-$0.07 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.70
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
PYVAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PYVAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PYVAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. PYVAX (1.04B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than PYVAX: RMEBX (1.09) vs PYVAX (0.84). PYVAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PYVAX (14 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than PYVAX (1.01). PYVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PYVAX: RMEBX (250) vs PYVAX (5000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.57 vs. PYVAX (-5.84). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.29 vs. PYVAX (11.60).
| PYVAX | RMEBX | PYVAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.07 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.07 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.588 | 11.308 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 1.09 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.84 | 7.57 | -77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.30 | 31.59 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.60 | 55.29 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.32 | 89.40 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement