Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PYSVX vs SSGSX
PYSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PYSVX vs SSGSX
Putnam Small Cap Value Y
Price$15.94
Change-$0.35 (-2.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets253.77M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$42.53
Change-$0.78 (-1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.63B
PYSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PYSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PYSVX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.63B vs. PYSVX (254M). PYSVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PYSVX (0.92) vs SSGSX (0.52). PYSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PYSVX (24 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than PYSVX (0.93). PYSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). PYSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: PYSVX (500) vs SSGSX (2500). PYSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.66 vs. SSGSX (-8.36). PYSVX return over 5 years is better than : 90.39 vs. SSGSX (21.72).
| PYSVX | SSGSX | PYSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.401 | -8.400 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 2500 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 254M | 5.63B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.52 | 176% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.66 | -8.36 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.07 | -3.90 | -258% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.39 | 21.72 | 416% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.91 | 7.10 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers