Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PYSVX vs SSGSX
PYSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PYSVX vs SSGSX
Putnam Small Cap Value Y
Price$17.20
Change+$0.12 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets267.76M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.47
Change+$0.28 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.82B
PYSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PYSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PYSVX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.82B vs. PYSVX (268M). PYSVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PYSVX (0.89) vs SSGSX (0.51). PYSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PYSVX (25 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than PYSVX (0.93). PYSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). PYSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: PYSVX (500) vs SSGSX (2500). PYSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.90 vs. SSGSX (-1.26). PYSVX return over 5 years is better than : 102.17 vs. SSGSX (29.33).
| PYSVX | SSGSX | PYSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.26 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.077 | -2.068 | -100% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 2500 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 268M | 5.82B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 0.51 | 176% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.90 | -1.26 | -388% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.90 | 2.38 | 921% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.17 | 29.33 | 348% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.25 | 16.52 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement