Advertisement
PYPL vs XYF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PYPL is a Buy and XYF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PYPL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileXYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PYPL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- XYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PYPL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XYF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PYPL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- XYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
PYPL (@Savings Banks) experienced а -24.13% price change this week, while XYF (@Savings Banks) price change was -9.23% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.53%.
Reported Earning Dates
PYPL is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Savings Banks (-2.23% weekly)A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.
| PYPL | XYF | PYPL / XYF | |
| Capitalization | 37.8B | 204M | 18,529% |
| EBITDA | 7.48B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -29.719 | -6.964 | 427% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.58 | 0.88 | 857% |
| Revenue | 32.9B | 3.44B | 957% |
| Total Cash | 10.8B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 11.3B | 566M | 1,996% |
PYPL | XYF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 39 Fair valued | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 82 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 92 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
XYF's Valuation (4) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PYPL (39) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that XYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PYPL’s over the last 12 months.
XYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as PYPL (100) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that XYF’s stock grew similarly to PYPL’s over the last 12 months.
PYPL's SMR Rating (38) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XYF (99) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that PYPL’s stock grew somewhat faster than XYF’s over the last 12 months.
PYPL's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as XYF (92) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that PYPL’s stock grew similarly to XYF’s over the last 12 months.
XYF's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as PYPL (98) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that XYF’s stock grew similarly to PYPL’s over the last 12 months.
| PYPL | XYF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 64% | 25 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 7 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 87% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RWM | 15.54 | 0.14 | +0.91% |
| ProShares Short Russell2000 | |||
| GMEY | 38.29 | 0.30 | +0.80% |
| YieldMax GME Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
| DFLV | 36.59 | 0.18 | +0.49% |
| Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF | |||
| GGUS | 61.31 | -0.76 | -1.22% |
| Goldman Sachs MktBt Russell LgCpGrEqETF | |||
| REK | 16.82 | -0.26 | -1.50% |
| ProShares Short Real Estate | |||
PYPL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PYPL has been closely correlated with NISN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PYPL jumps, then NISN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PYPL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PYPL | 100% | -1.61% | ||
| NISN - PYPL | 76% Closely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| XYF - PYPL | 74% Closely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| QFIN - PYPL | 74% Closely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| LX - PYPL | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| OMF - PYPL | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.39% | ||
More | ||||
XYF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XYF has been closely correlated with QFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XYF jumps, then QFIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XYF | 100% | +1.17% | ||
| QFIN - XYF | 82% Closely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| NISN - XYF | 75% Closely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| FINV - XYF | 67% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| LU - XYF | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.57% | ||
| LMFA - XYF | 63% Loosely correlated | -5.82% | ||
More | ||||