PYPL
Price
$57.65
Change
+$1.09 (+1.93%)
Updated
Jan 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
52.92B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
V
Price
$329.31
Change
+$1.44 (+0.44%)
Updated
Jan 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
632.17B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PYPL vs V

Header iconPYPL vs V Comparison
Open Charts PYPL vs VBanner chart's image
PayPal Holdings
Price$57.65
Change+$1.09 (+1.93%)
Volume$234.42K
Capitalization52.92B
VISA
Price$329.31
Change+$1.44 (+0.44%)
Volume$34.54K
Capitalization632.17B
PYPL vs V Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PYPL vs. V commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PYPL is a Hold and V is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (PYPL: $56.56 vs. V: $327.88)
Brand notoriety: PYPL and V are both notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PYPL: 103% vs. V: 299%
Market capitalization -- PYPL: $52.92B vs. V: $632.17B
PYPL [@Savings Banks] is valued at $52.92B. V’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $632.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $632.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $21.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PYPL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileV’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PYPL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • V’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, V is a better buy in the long-term than PYPL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PYPL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while V’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PYPL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • V’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, V is a better buy in the short-term than PYPL.

Price Growth

PYPL (@Savings Banks) experienced а -5.43% price change this week, while V (@Savings Banks) price change was -8.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

PYPL is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

V is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-1.00% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
V($632B) has a higher market cap than PYPL($52.9B). V has higher P/E ratio than PYPL: V (32.15) vs PYPL (11.36). PYPL YTD gains are higher at: -3.118 vs. V (-6.510). V has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 26B vs. PYPL (7.48B). V has more cash in the bank: 19B vs. PYPL (10.8B). PYPL has less debt than V: PYPL (11.3B) vs V (25.2B). V has higher revenues than PYPL: V (40B) vs PYPL (32.9B).
PYPLVPYPL / V
Capitalization52.9B632B8%
EBITDA7.48B26B29%
Gain YTD-3.118-6.51048%
P/E Ratio11.3632.1535%
Revenue32.9B40B82%
Total Cash10.8B19B57%
Total Debt11.3B25.2B45%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PYPL vs V: Fundamental Ratings
PYPL
V
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5371
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10026
SMR RATING
1..100
3919
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6457
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9350
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2485

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PYPL's Valuation (69) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as V (96) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that PYPL’s stock grew similarly to V’s over the last 12 months.

V's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for PYPL (100) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that V’s stock grew significantly faster than PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

V's SMR Rating (19) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as PYPL (39) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that V’s stock grew similarly to PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

V's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as PYPL (64) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that V’s stock grew similarly to PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

V's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PYPL (93) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that V’s stock grew somewhat faster than PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PYPLV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PYPL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
V
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LMBO27.090.36
+1.35%
Direxion Daily Crypto Industry Bull2XETF
QQQJ39.140.04
+0.10%
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
SCHX27.41-0.06
-0.22%
Schwab US Large-Cap ETF™
KF40.32-0.15
-0.37%
Korea Fund
LDEM60.88-0.36
-0.58%
iShares® ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF

PYPL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PYPL has been loosely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PYPL jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PYPL
1D Price
Change %
PYPL100%
-1.27%
SYF - PYPL
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.97%
AXP - PYPL
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
BFH - PYPL
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.77%
OMF - PYPL
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
AL - PYPL
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
More

V and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, V has been closely correlated with MA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if V jumps, then MA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To V
1D Price
Change %
V100%
-4.46%
MA - V
92%
Closely correlated
-3.76%
AXP - V
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
OBDC - V
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.66%
COF - V
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
PYPL - V
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
More