Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PWTAX vs RLBEX
PWTAX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts PWTAX vs RLBEX
UBS US Allocation A
Price$52.23
Change-$0.10 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets220.05M
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$37.38
Change-$0.09 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.26B
PWTAX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PWTAX vs. RLBEX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PWTAX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. PWTAX (220M). RLBEX pays higher dividends than PWTAX: RLBEX (1.81) vs PWTAX (1.54). PWTAX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: PWTAX (32 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). PWTAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). PWTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PWTAX: RLBEX (250) vs PWTAX (1000). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.95 vs. PWTAX (4.18). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 37.99 vs. PWTAX (6.40).
| PWTAX | RLBEX | PWTAX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.59 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.59 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.614 | 9.737 | 68% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 220M | 256B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.54 | 1.81 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.18 | 7.95 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.25 | 29.52 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.40 | 37.99 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.22 | 68.32 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers