Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PWTAX vs RLBEX
PWTAX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts PWTAX vs RLBEX
UBS US Allocation A
Price$52.86
Change+$0.06 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets221.71M
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$37.93
Change+$0.20 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets257.73B
PWTAX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PWTAX vs. RLBEX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PWTAX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 258B vs. PWTAX (222M). RLBEX pays higher dividends than PWTAX: RLBEX (1.79) vs PWTAX (1.51). PWTAX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: PWTAX (32 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). PWTAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). PWTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PWTAX: RLBEX (250) vs PWTAX (1000). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.94 vs. PWTAX (5.18). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.68 vs. PWTAX (6.67).
| PWTAX | RLBEX | PWTAX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.59 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.59 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.900 | 11.352 | 70% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 222M | 258B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.79 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.18 | 9.94 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.47 | 39.85 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.67 | 39.68 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.74 | 77.45 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement