Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PWTAX vs RLBCX
PWTAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PWTAX vs RLBCX
UBS US Allocation A
Price$54.36
Change+$0.04 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets225.58M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.75
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.62B
PWTAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PWTAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PWTAX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. PWTAX (226M). RLBCX (1.49) and PWTAX (1.46) have matching dividends . PWTAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PWTAX (32 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). PWTAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). PWTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PWTAX: RLBCX (250) vs PWTAX (1000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.34 vs. PWTAX (3.84). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.24 vs. PWTAX (6.81).
| PWTAX | RLBCX | PWTAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.89 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.89 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.961 | 14.364 | 76% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 226M | 266B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 1.49 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.84 | 8.34 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.46 | 49.26 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.81 | 40.24 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.72 | 72.18 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers