Advertisement
PWR vs STN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PWR is a Buy and STN is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PWR’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSTN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PWR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- STN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PWR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PWR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- STN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
PWR (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +1.95% price change this week, while STN (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -1.49% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.04%.
Reported Earning Dates
PWR is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.
STN is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-0.43% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| PWR | STN | PWR / STN | |
| Capitalization | 72.9B | 11.3B | 645% |
| EBITDA | 2.5B | 1.07B | 235% |
| Gain YTD | 15.796 | 5.362 | 295% |
| P/E Ratio | 72.39 | 32.07 | 226% |
| Revenue | 27.2B | 7.99B | 341% |
| Total Cash | 250M | 382M | 65% |
| Total Debt | 6.02B | 2.71B | 222% |
PWR | STN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 12 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 59 | 51 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | 62 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 49 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
STN's Valuation (88) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (91). This means that STN’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as STN (12). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to STN’s over the last 12 months.
STN's SMR Rating (51) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (59). This means that STN’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Price Growth Rating (13) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STN (55). This means that PWR’s stock grew somewhat faster than STN’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STN (62). This means that PWR’s stock grew somewhat faster than STN’s over the last 12 months.
| PWR | STN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 47% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 46% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 14 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 58% | 10 days ago 44% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 47% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 55% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PUI | 45.18 | 0.71 | +1.61% |
| Invesco Dorsey Wright Utilities Momt ETF | |||
| SLDR | 50.24 | -0.01 | -0.01% |
| Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF | |||
| ISCB | 68.05 | -0.05 | -0.07% |
| iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | |||
| FLCE | 28.90 | -0.24 | -0.83% |
| Frontier Asset U.S. Large-Cap Equity ETF | |||
| NBXG | 13.96 | -0.36 | -2.51% |
| Neuberger Next Generation Connectivity Fund Inc. | |||
PWR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWR has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWR jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PWR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWR | 100% | +2.27% | ||
| MTZ - PWR | 84% Closely correlated | +1.67% | ||
| FIX - PWR | 80% Closely correlated | +2.87% | ||
| EME - PWR | 79% Closely correlated | +1.76% | ||
| PRIM - PWR | 76% Closely correlated | +1.43% | ||
| STRL - PWR | 74% Closely correlated | +5.12% | ||
More | ||||
STN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STN has been loosely correlated with ACM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STN jumps, then ACM could also see price increases.