PWR
Price
$358.26
Change
-$0.39 (-0.11%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
53.09B
46 days until earnings call
SHIM
Price
$1.65
Change
-$0.07 (-4.07%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
56.8M
60 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PWR vs SHIM

Header iconPWR vs SHIM Comparison
Open Charts PWR vs SHIMBanner chart's image
Quanta Services
Price$358.26
Change-$0.39 (-0.11%)
Volume$796.21K
Capitalization53.09B
Shimmick
Price$1.65
Change-$0.07 (-4.07%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization56.8M
PWR vs SHIM Comparison Chart
Loading...
PWR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PWR vs. SHIM commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PWR is a Buy and SHIM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (PWR: $358.26 vs. SHIM: $1.65)
Brand notoriety: PWR and SHIM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PWR: 68% vs. SHIM: 22%
Market capitalization -- PWR: $53.09B vs. SHIM: $56.8M
PWR [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $53.09B. SHIM’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $56.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $15.31T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PWR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSHIM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PWR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SHIM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PWR is a better buy in the long-term than SHIM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PWR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHIM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PWR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SHIM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SHIM is a better buy in the short-term than PWR.

Price Growth

PWR (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -0.86% price change this week, while SHIM (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +10.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

PWR is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

SHIM is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-0.15% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PWR($53.1B) has a higher market cap than SHIM($56.8M). PWR YTD gains are higher at: 13.434 vs. SHIM (-36.293). PWR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.25B vs. SHIM (-82.44M). PWR has more cash in the bank: 521M vs. SHIM (16.3M). SHIM has less debt than PWR: SHIM (47.7M) vs PWR (4.75B). PWR has higher revenues than SHIM: PWR (24.9B) vs SHIM (482M).
PWRSHIMPWR / SHIM
Capitalization53.1B56.8M93,486%
EBITDA2.25B-82.44M-2,733%
Gain YTD13.434-36.293-37%
P/E Ratio57.78N/A-
Revenue24.9B482M5,166%
Total Cash521M16.3M3,196%
Total Debt4.75B47.7M9,954%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PWR: Fundamental Ratings
PWR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10
SMR RATING
1..100
58
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PWRSHIM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PWR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LINK5.410.03
+0.56%
Interlink Electronics
RYAN65.82-0.43
-0.65%
Ryan Specialty Holdings
LOVE16.65-0.17
-0.98%
Lovesac Company (The)
SCHW87.36-1.14
-1.29%
Charles Schwab Corp (The)
HLIT8.85-0.41
-4.43%
Harmonic

PWR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWR has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWR jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWR
1D Price
Change %
PWR100%
-0.11%
FIX - PWR
83%
Closely correlated
-1.70%
MTZ - PWR
83%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
PRIM - PWR
83%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
EME - PWR
82%
Closely correlated
+0.63%
STRL - PWR
78%
Closely correlated
-0.65%
More

SHIM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHIM and ACM have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHIM and ACM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHIM
1D Price
Change %
SHIM100%
-4.07%
ACM - SHIM
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
FER - SHIM
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
CDLR - SHIM
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
J - SHIM
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
PWR - SHIM
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
More