Advertisement
PWR vs SAMT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PWR is a StrongBuy and SAMT is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PWR’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while.
- PWR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PWR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- PWR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
PWR (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +0.97% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +4.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +509.99%.
Reported Earning Dates
PWR is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (+4.64% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
PWR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 33 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| PWR | SAMT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 58% | 6 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 43% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 80% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MGK | 379.52 | 1.53 | +0.40% |
| Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | |||
| AJUL | 28.16 | 0.07 | +0.26% |
| Innovator Eq Dfnd Prot ETF - 2Yr toJul26 | |||
| SMLV | 127.23 | 0.29 | +0.23% |
| SPDR® SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatil ETF | |||
| IBDY | 25.78 | 0.06 | +0.21% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Corp ETF | |||
| DURA | 33.75 | 0.07 | +0.20% |
| VanEck Durable High Dividend ETF | |||
PWR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWR has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWR jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PWR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWR | 100% | N/A | ||
| MTZ - PWR | 86% Closely correlated | +2.44% | ||
| EME - PWR | 84% Closely correlated | +9.72% | ||
| PRIM - PWR | 84% Closely correlated | +3.22% | ||
| FIX - PWR | 80% Closely correlated | +22.37% | ||
| STRL - PWR | 80% Closely correlated | +6.12% | ||
More | ||||
SAMT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAMT has been closely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAMT jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAMT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAMT | 100% | +0.89% | ||
| PWR - SAMT | 74% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| GEV - SAMT | 72% Closely correlated | +3.30% | ||
| GS - SAMT | 69% Closely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| ISRG - SAMT | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.48% | ||
| CEG - SAMT | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.77% | ||
More | ||||