PWP
Price
$21.81
Change
-$0.54 (-2.42%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.36B
74 days until earnings call
XAUMF
Price
$6.48
Change
+$0.04 (+0.62%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
82.1M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PWP vs XAUMF

Header iconPWP vs XAUMF Comparison
Open Charts PWP vs XAUMFBanner chart's image
Perella Weinberg Partners
Price$21.81
Change-$0.54 (-2.42%)
Volume$673.3K
Capitalization1.36B
Goldmoney
Price$6.48
Change+$0.04 (+0.62%)
Volume$2.43K
Capitalization82.1M
PWP vs XAUMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PWP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XAUMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PWP vs. XAUMF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PWP is a Hold and XAUMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (PWP: $21.81 vs. XAUMF: $6.48)
Brand notoriety: PWP and XAUMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PWP: 58% vs. XAUMF: 53%
Market capitalization -- PWP: $1.36B vs. XAUMF: $82.1M
PWP [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $1.36B. XAUMF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $82.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PWP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXAUMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PWP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • XAUMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PWP is a better buy in the long-term than XAUMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PWP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XAUMF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PWP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • XAUMF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, XAUMF is a better buy in the short-term than PWP.

Price Growth

PWP (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -1.67% price change this week, while XAUMF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

PWP is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.19% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PWP($1.36B) has a higher market cap than XAUMF($82.1M). PWP has higher P/E ratio than XAUMF: PWP (21.17) vs XAUMF (6.21). XAUMF YTD gains are higher at: 21.169 vs. PWP (-7.914). PWP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 98.1M vs. XAUMF (-21.8M). PWP has more cash in the bank: 145M vs. XAUMF (9.31M). XAUMF has less debt than PWP: XAUMF (84.1M) vs PWP (185M). PWP has higher revenues than XAUMF: PWP (871M) vs XAUMF (80.5M).
PWPXAUMFPWP / XAUMF
Capitalization1.36B82.1M1,661%
EBITDA98.1M-21.8M-450%
Gain YTD-7.91421.169-37%
P/E Ratio21.176.21341%
Revenue871M80.5M1,082%
Total Cash145M9.31M1,558%
Total Debt185M84.1M220%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
XAUMF: Fundamental Ratings
XAUMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
83
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PWPXAUMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PWP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XAUMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UNCFF82.210.58
+0.71%
UniCredito Spa
EMYB15.93N/A
N/A
Embassy Bancorp Inc.
NLTBF6.48N/A
N/A
Nolato AB
LUDG0.08N/A
N/A
Ludwig Enterprises, Inc.
THNPY47.40-0.07
-0.16%
Technip Energies NV

PWP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWP has been closely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWP jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWP
1D Price
Change %
PWP100%
-2.42%
PIPR - PWP
84%
Closely correlated
-1.74%
EVR - PWP
84%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
MC - PWP
83%
Closely correlated
-3.05%
LAZ - PWP
78%
Closely correlated
-2.37%
SF - PWP
78%
Closely correlated
-1.47%
More

XAUMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XAUMF and CCORF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XAUMF and CCORF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XAUMF
1D Price
Change %
XAUMF100%
+0.62%
CCORF - XAUMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
PWP - XAUMF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.42%
MIGI - XAUMF
8%
Poorly correlated
-6.17%
TMXXF - XAUMF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
DEFT - XAUMF
3%
Poorly correlated
-11.69%
More