PWP
Price
$21.20
Change
+$1.49 (+7.56%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.41B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SF
Price
$125.04
Change
+$0.76 (+0.61%)
Updated
Feb 4, 10:59 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.63B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PWP vs SF

Header iconPWP vs SF Comparison
Open Charts PWP vs SFBanner chart's image
Perella Weinberg Partners
Price$21.20
Change+$1.49 (+7.56%)
Volume$1.14M
Capitalization1.41B
Stifel Financial
Price$125.04
Change+$0.76 (+0.61%)
Volume$100
Capitalization12.63B
PWP vs SF Comparison Chart in %
PWP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PWP vs. SF commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PWP is a Buy and SF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (PWP: $21.20 vs. SF: $124.28)
Brand notoriety: PWP and SF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PWP: 125% vs. SF: 162%
Market capitalization -- PWP: $1.41B vs. SF: $12.63B
PWP [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $1.41B. SF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $12.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PWP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PWP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PWP is a better buy in the long-term than SF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PWP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PWP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PWP is a better buy in the short-term than SF.

Price Growth

PWP (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -4.98% price change this week, while SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -5.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

PWP is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2026.

SF is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-5.89% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SF($12.6B) has a higher market cap than PWP($1.41B). PWP has higher P/E ratio than SF: PWP (27.89) vs SF (21.17). PWP YTD gains are higher at: 22.543 vs. SF (-0.751). PWP has less debt than SF: PWP (185M) vs SF (1.53B). SF has higher revenues than PWP: SF (5.27B) vs PWP (757M).
PWPSFPWP / SF
Capitalization1.41B12.6B11%
EBITDA71MN/A-
Gain YTD22.543-0.751-3,003%
P/E Ratio27.8921.17132%
Revenue757M5.27B14%
Total Cash186MN/A-
Total Debt185M1.53B12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SF: Fundamental Ratings
SF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
66
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
26
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PWPSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PWP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
METD14.920.31
+2.12%
Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF
UTES76.920.60
+0.79%
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
KBWP124.370.71
+0.58%
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Ins ETF
BNDS51.150.01
+0.02%
Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF
TRND34.50-0.18
-0.51%
Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF

PWP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWP has been closely correlated with MC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWP jumps, then MC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWP
1D Price
Change %
PWP100%
-4.12%
MC - PWP
85%
Closely correlated
-3.17%
PIPR - PWP
80%
Closely correlated
-3.13%
EVR - PWP
79%
Closely correlated
-4.50%
JEF - PWP
79%
Closely correlated
N/A
SF - PWP
78%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
More