PWM
Price
$0.55
Change
+$0.05 (+10.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
17.37M
SHNWF
Price
$5.33
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
7.7B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PWM vs SHNWF

Header iconPWM vs SHNWF Comparison
Open Charts PWM vs SHNWFBanner chart's image
Prestige Wealth
Price$0.55
Change+$0.05 (+10.00%)
Volume$148.12K
Capitalization17.37M
Schroders
Price$5.33
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$357
Capitalization7.7B
PWM vs SHNWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHNWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PWM vs. SHNWF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PWM is a StrongBuy and SHNWF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (PWM: $0.55 vs. SHNWF: $5.32)
Brand notoriety: PWM and SHNWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PWM: 25% vs. SHNWF: 9%
Market capitalization -- PWM: $17.37M vs. SHNWF: $7.7B
PWM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $17.37M. SHNWF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $7.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PWM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSHNWF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PWM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SHNWF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SHNWF is a better buy in the long-term than PWM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PWM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHNWF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PWM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SHNWF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PWM is a better buy in the short-term than SHNWF.

Price Growth

PWM (@Investment Managers) experienced а -6.93% price change this week, while SHNWF (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.07%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.95% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHNWF($7.7B) has a higher market cap than PWM($17.4M). SHNWF YTD gains are higher at: 26.786 vs. PWM (-57.762).
PWMSHNWFPWM / SHNWF
Capitalization17.4M7.7B0%
EBITDAN/A655M-
Gain YTD-57.76226.786-216%
P/E RatioN/A17.75-
RevenueN/A3.02B-
Total CashN/A7.06B-
Total DebtN/A588M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PWMSHNWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
85%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHNWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OS19.710.22
+1.13%
OneStream Inc
MTB200.141.35
+0.68%
M&T Bank Corp
GLDD11.780.02
+0.17%
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp
ICU0.60-0.01
-1.00%
SeaStar Medical Holding Corp
FBRX13.84-0.41
-2.88%
Forte Biosciences Inc

PWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PWM and MSIF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PWM and MSIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWM
1D Price
Change %
PWM100%
+9.38%
MSIF - PWM
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
AMTD - PWM
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.89%
MAAS - PWM
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
EICC - PWM
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BX - PWM
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
More

SHNWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHNWF and FNCSF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHNWF and FNCSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHNWF
1D Price
Change %
SHNWF100%
N/A
FNCSF - SHNWF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GAMI - SHNWF
17%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
PWM - SHNWF
10%
Poorly correlated
+9.38%
CRBG - SHNWF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
DEFG - SHNWF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.50%
More