PWCDF
Price
$38.81
Change
+$0.40 (+1.04%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
18.61B
SGCFF
Price
$6.50
Change
+$0.30 (+4.84%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
461.39M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PWCDF vs SGCFF

Header iconPWCDF vs SGCFF Comparison
Open Charts PWCDF vs SGCFFBanner chart's image
Power Corp. of Canada
Price$38.81
Change+$0.40 (+1.04%)
Volume$93.37K
Capitalization18.61B
Sagicor Finl
Price$6.50
Change+$0.30 (+4.84%)
Volume$100
Capitalization461.39M
PWCDF vs SGCFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PWCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PWCDF vs. SGCFF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PWCDF is a Hold and SGCFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (PWCDF: $38.81 vs. SGCFF: $6.50)
Brand notoriety: PWCDF and SGCFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PWCDF: 112% vs. SGCFF: 13%
Market capitalization -- PWCDF: $18.61B vs. SGCFF: $461.39M
PWCDF [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $18.61B. SGCFF’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $461.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PWCDF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSGCFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PWCDF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SGCFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PWCDF and SGCFF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PWCDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SGCFF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PWCDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SGCFF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SGCFF is a better buy in the short-term than PWCDF.

Price Growth

PWCDF (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -1.36% price change this week, while SGCFF (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.76%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+0.76% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PWCDF($18.6B) has a higher market cap than SGCFF($461M). PWCDF has higher P/E ratio than SGCFF: PWCDF (18.90) vs SGCFF (2.37). SGCFF YTD gains are higher at: 50.647 vs. PWCDF (24.391). PWCDF has more cash in the bank: 8.93B vs. SGCFF (385M). SGCFF has less debt than PWCDF: SGCFF (680M) vs PWCDF (15.6B). PWCDF has higher revenues than SGCFF: PWCDF (64.8B) vs SGCFF (2.88B).
PWCDFSGCFFPWCDF / SGCFF
Capitalization18.6B461M4,035%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD24.39150.64748%
P/E Ratio18.902.37799%
Revenue64.8B2.88B2,251%
Total Cash8.93B385M2,319%
Total Debt15.6B680M2,294%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PWCDF: Fundamental Ratings
PWCDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
22
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
22
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PWCDFSGCFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
32%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
70%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PWCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OASGX11.650.12
+1.04%
Optimum Small-Mid Cap Growth A
TMCGX15.280.13
+0.86%
Thrivent Mid Cap Growth S
BWLRX24.700.16
+0.65%
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Value R6
JVAPX38.510.17
+0.44%
JPMorgan Value Advantage R3
FEBRX14.760.03
+0.20%
First Eagle Global Income Builder R6

PWCDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWCDF has been loosely correlated with GWLIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PWCDF jumps, then GWLIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWCDF
1D Price
Change %
PWCDF100%
+1.04%
GWLIF - PWCDF
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
PRU - PWCDF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
SLLDY - PWCDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
MET - PWCDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
TDHOY - PWCDF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
More

SGCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SGCFF and FLFG have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SGCFF and FLFG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGCFF
1D Price
Change %
SGCFF100%
N/A
FLFG - SGCFF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PWCDF - SGCFF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
TDHOY - SGCFF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
SLLDY - SGCFF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
PUKPF - SGCFF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More