PVLUF
Price
$100.19
Change
-$5.09 (-4.83%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
RMCO
Price
$1.59
Change
-$0.07 (-4.22%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
16.55M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PVLUF vs RMCO

Header iconPVLUF vs RMCO Comparison
Open Charts PVLUF vs RMCOBanner chart's image
Partners Value Invts
Price$100.19
Change-$5.09 (-4.83%)
Volume$300
CapitalizationN/A
Royalty Management Holding
Price$1.59
Change-$0.07 (-4.22%)
Volume$360.36K
Capitalization16.55M
PVLUF vs RMCO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PVLUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PVLUF vs. RMCO commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PVLUF is a Hold and RMCO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (PVLUF: $100.19 vs. RMCO: $1.59)
Brand notoriety: PVLUF and RMCO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PVLUF: 60% vs. RMCO: 745%
Market capitalization -- PVLUF: $0 vs. RMCO: $16.55M
PVLUF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $0. RMCO’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $16.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PVLUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRMCO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PVLUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RMCO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PVLUF is a better buy in the long-term than RMCO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PVLUF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMCO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PVLUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • RMCO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMCO is a better buy in the short-term than PVLUF.

Price Growth

PVLUF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -4.84% price change this week, while RMCO (@Investment Managers) price change was +28.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.30%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.13% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PVLUF YTD gains are higher at: 99.771 vs. RMCO (62.570).
PVLUFRMCOPVLUF / RMCO
CapitalizationN/A16.6M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD99.77162.570159%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/A98.4K-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PVLUF: Fundamental Ratings
PVLUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
53

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PVLUFRMCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
6%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
2%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PVLUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARTW2.270.07
+3.18%
Art's-Way Manufacturing Co
BRC69.680.42
+0.61%
Brady Corp
ELVA3.330.02
+0.60%
Electrovaya
WBA11.47-0.02
-0.17%
Walgreens Boots Alliance
CCRN13.01-0.08
-0.61%
Cross Country Healthcare

PVLUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PVLUF and RMCO have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PVLUF and RMCO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PVLUF
1D Price
Change %
PVLUF100%
N/A
RMCO - PVLUF
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.22%
CLSPF - PVLUF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRNLY - PVLUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGCP - PVLUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ITPC - PVLUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RMCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMCO and PVLUF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMCO and PVLUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMCO
1D Price
Change %
RMCO100%
-4.22%
PVLUF - RMCO
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WT - RMCO
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.88%
FSK - RMCO
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
GCMG - RMCO
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
SAR - RMCO
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
More