PUBC
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
15.01M
SBMSF
Price
$0.06
Change
+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
10.83M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PUBC vs SBMSF

Header iconPUBC vs SBMSF Comparison
Open Charts PUBC vs SBMSFBanner chart's image
Purebase
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization15.01M
Danakali
Price$0.06
Change+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization10.83M
PUBC vs SBMSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PUBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PUBC vs. SBMSF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PUBC is a StrongBuy and SBMSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (PUBC: $0.05 vs. SBMSF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: PUBC and SBMSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Agricultural industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PUBC: 1% vs. SBMSF: 5%
Market capitalization -- PUBC: $15.01M vs. SBMSF: $10.83M
PUBC [@Chemicals: Agricultural] is valued at $15.01M. SBMSF’s [@Chemicals: Agricultural] market capitalization is $10.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry ranges from $46.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry is $4.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PUBC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBMSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PUBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBMSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBMSF is a better buy in the long-term than PUBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PUBC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBMSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PUBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SBMSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SBMSF is a better buy in the short-term than PUBC.

Price Growth

PUBC (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а +31.39% price change this week, while SBMSF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was -13.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Agricultural (+0.38% weekly)

The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PUBC($15M) has a higher market cap than SBMSF($10.8M). PUBC YTD gains are higher at: -21.739 vs. SBMSF (-61.856).
PUBCSBMSFPUBC / SBMSF
Capitalization15M10.8M139%
EBITDA-1.34MN/A-
Gain YTD-21.739-61.85635%
P/E RatioN/A33.74-
Revenue403KN/A-
Total Cash500N/A-
Total Debt1.72MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PUBC vs SBMSF: Fundamental Ratings
PUBC
SBMSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10095
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6544
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10097
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5046

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PUBC's Valuation (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBMSF (47). This means that PUBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBMSF’s over the last 12 months.

PUBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SBMSF (100). This means that PUBC’s stock grew similarly to SBMSF’s over the last 12 months.

SBMSF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as PUBC (100). This means that SBMSF’s stock grew similarly to PUBC’s over the last 12 months.

SBMSF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as PUBC (65). This means that SBMSF’s stock grew similarly to PUBC’s over the last 12 months.

SBMSF's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as PUBC (100). This means that SBMSF’s stock grew similarly to PUBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PUBCSBMSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
85%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
86%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PUBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GPPRF0.390.03
+7.19%
Cerro De Pasco Res Inc.
WJRYY22.430.24
+1.08%
West Japan Railway Co.
CNTHO44.60N/A
N/A
Connecticut Light & Power Co. (The)
UNIF4.00N/A
N/A
U & I Financial Corp
LNXSY5.23N/A
N/A
Lanxess Ag

PUBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PUBC and YARIY have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PUBC and YARIY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PUBC
1D Price
Change %
PUBC100%
N/A
YARIY - PUBC
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
NUFMF - PUBC
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VVIVF - PUBC
1%
Poorly correlated
+7.69%
SBMSF - PUBC
1%
Poorly correlated
+20.00%
SNFRF - PUBC
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SBMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBMSF and YRAIF have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBMSF and YRAIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBMSF
1D Price
Change %
SBMSF100%
+20.00%
YRAIF - SBMSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PUBC - SBMSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NUFMF - SBMSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YARIY - SBMSF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
MGROF - SBMSF
-5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More