PTMEY
Price
$1.18
Change
-$0.12 (-9.23%)
Updated
Sep 12 closing price
Capitalization
234.32M
SCPPF
Price
$0.30
Change
+$0.02 (+6.90%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
190.54M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PTMEY vs SCPPF

Header iconPTMEY vs SCPPF Comparison
Open Charts PTMEY vs SCPPFBanner chart's image
PT Media Nusantara Citra TBK
Price$1.18
Change-$0.12 (-9.23%)
Volume$140
Capitalization234.32M
S4 Capital
Price$0.30
Change+$0.02 (+6.90%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization190.54M
PTMEY vs SCPPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PTMEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PTMEY vs. SCPPF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PTMEY is a Hold and SCPPF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (PTMEY: $1.18 vs. SCPPF: $0.31)
Brand notoriety: PTMEY and SCPPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Advertising/Marketing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PTMEY: 1% vs. SCPPF: 18%
Market capitalization -- PTMEY: $234.32M vs. SCPPF: $190.54M
PTMEY [@Advertising/Marketing Services] is valued at $234.32M. SCPPF’s [@Advertising/Marketing Services] market capitalization is $190.54M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Advertising/Marketing Services] industry ranges from $226.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Advertising/Marketing Services] industry is $5.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PTMEY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSCPPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PTMEY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SCPPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PTMEY and SCPPF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PTMEY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCPPF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PTMEY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SCPPF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCPPF is a better buy in the short-term than PTMEY.

Price Growth

PTMEY (@Advertising/Marketing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SCPPF (@Advertising/Marketing Services) price change was +20.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Advertising/Marketing Services industry was -0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +37.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +153.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Advertising/Marketing Services (-0.27% weekly)

Making a brand known to people, garnering more clients/consumers for its product and solidifying the brand’s position in an industry – all of these are essential to a company’s growth, and that’s where marketing/advertising come in as one of the key catalysts. Advertising industry is a global multibillion-dollar business of public relations and marketing companies, media services and advertising agencies – entities that help to connect manufacturers/producers with customers. Digital media has played a big role in the growth of global advertising, and agencies invest substantially to integrate advanced technologies into their business operations. According to some estimates, the U.S. advertising industry is expected to generate revenue of $52.6 billion by 2023, up from almost $40 billion in 2015 . Omnicom Group Inc., Trade Desk, Inc. and Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. are some of the major U.S. companies in the industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PTMEY($234M) has a higher market cap than SCPPF($191M). SCPPF has higher P/E ratio than PTMEY: SCPPF (57.81) vs PTMEY (2.90). SCPPF YTD gains are higher at: -23.750 vs. PTMEY (-37.234).
PTMEYSCPPFPTMEY / SCPPF
Capitalization234M191M123%
EBITDA1.85TN/A-
Gain YTD-37.234-23.750157%
P/E Ratio2.9057.815%
Revenue7.73TN/A-
Total Cash1.45TN/A-
Total Debt1.46TN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PTMEY vs SCPPF: Fundamental Ratings
PTMEY
SCPPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9928
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
1095
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9488
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7376
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCPPF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PTMEY (95). This means that SCPPF’s stock grew significantly faster than PTMEY’s over the last 12 months.

SCPPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PTMEY (100). This means that SCPPF’s stock grew similarly to PTMEY’s over the last 12 months.

PTMEY's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SCPPF (95). This means that PTMEY’s stock grew significantly faster than SCPPF’s over the last 12 months.

SCPPF's Price Growth Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as PTMEY (94). This means that SCPPF’s stock grew similarly to PTMEY’s over the last 12 months.

PTMEY's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as SCPPF (76). This means that PTMEY’s stock grew similarly to SCPPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PTMEYSCPPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PTMEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RPMIX9.670.09
+0.94%
Royce Small-Cap Fund Instl
LFMGX23.290.20
+0.87%
Lord Abbett Micro Cap Growth F
HGOCX66.000.21
+0.32%
Hartford Growth Opportunities C
IEGFX23.12N/A
N/A
Invesco International Small Company R6
ACEMX11.75-0.09
-0.76%
Alger Emerging Markets C

PTMEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PTMEY and JCDXF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PTMEY and JCDXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PTMEY
1D Price
Change %
PTMEY100%
N/A
JCDXF - PTMEY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PROM - PTMEY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KDOZF - PTMEY
4%
Poorly correlated
-4.38%
HKUOY - PTMEY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCPPF - PTMEY
2%
Poorly correlated
+4.02%
More

SCPPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCPPF and PUBGY have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCPPF and PUBGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCPPF
1D Price
Change %
SCPPF100%
+4.02%
PUBGY - SCPPF
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
HKUOY - SCPPF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NXFNF - SCPPF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KDOZF - SCPPF
7%
Poorly correlated
-4.38%
PROM - SCPPF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More