PTBRY
Price
$12.00
Change
-$1.82 (-13.17%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
9.28B
SWZNF
Price
$4093.00
Change
-$7.00 (-0.17%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
468.62M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PTBRY vs SWZNF

Header iconPTBRY vs SWZNF Comparison
Open Charts PTBRY vs SWZNFBanner chart's image
PT Bank Negara Indonesia TBK
Price$12.00
Change-$1.82 (-13.17%)
Volume$20.52K
Capitalization9.28B
Schweizerische Nationalbank
Price$4093.00
Change-$7.00 (-0.17%)
Volume$2
Capitalization468.62M
PTBRY vs SWZNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PTBRY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWZNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PTBRY vs. SWZNF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PTBRY is a Hold and SWZNF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (PTBRY: $12.00 vs. SWZNF: $4093.00)
Brand notoriety: PTBRY and SWZNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PTBRY: 144% vs. SWZNF: 78%
Market capitalization -- PTBRY: $9.28B vs. SWZNF: $468.62M
PTBRY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $9.28B. SWZNF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $468.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PTBRY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSWZNF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • PTBRY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SWZNF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PTBRY and SWZNF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PTBRY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SWZNF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PTBRY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SWZNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SWZNF is a better buy in the short-term than PTBRY.

Price Growth

PTBRY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -13.07% price change this week, while SWZNF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PTBRY($9.28B) has a higher market cap than SWZNF($469M). PTBRY has higher P/E ratio than SWZNF: PTBRY (7.16) vs SWZNF (0.04). SWZNF YTD gains are higher at: 15.707 vs. PTBRY (0.153). SWZNF has less debt than PTBRY: SWZNF (130B) vs PTBRY (65.68T). PTBRY has higher revenues than SWZNF: PTBRY (61.56T) vs SWZNF (9.05B).
PTBRYSWZNFPTBRY / SWZNF
Capitalization9.28B469M1,980%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.15315.7071%
P/E Ratio7.160.0418,980%
Revenue61.56T9.05B680,327%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt65.68T130B50,523%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PTBRY vs SWZNF: Fundamental Ratings
PTBRY
SWZNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1100
SMR RATING
1..100
16
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6456
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
833
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SWZNF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as PTBRY (11). This means that SWZNF’s stock grew similarly to PTBRY’s over the last 12 months.

PTBRY's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SWZNF (100). This means that PTBRY’s stock grew significantly faster than SWZNF’s over the last 12 months.

PTBRY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as SWZNF (6). This means that PTBRY’s stock grew similarly to SWZNF’s over the last 12 months.

SWZNF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as PTBRY (64). This means that SWZNF’s stock grew similarly to PTBRY’s over the last 12 months.

SWZNF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PTBRY (83). This means that SWZNF’s stock grew significantly faster than PTBRY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PTBRYSWZNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
86%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PTBRY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWZNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KIE59.170.68
+1.16%
SPDR® S&P Insurance ETF
DIA462.282.85
+0.62%
SPDR® Dow Jones Industrial Avrg ETF Tr
CUT29.270.12
+0.43%
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
BLUBF5.55N/A
N/A
Blue Ribbon Income Fund
DHF2.60-0.02
-0.76%
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund

PTBRY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PTBRY and FRFC have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PTBRY and FRFC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PTBRY
1D Price
Change %
PTBRY100%
-13.19%
FRFC - PTBRY
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
SWZNF - PTBRY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPXXF - PTBRY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKRKY - PTBRY
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
BDOUF - PTBRY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SWZNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SWZNF has been loosely correlated with IBWC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SWZNF jumps, then IBWC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWZNF
1D Price
Change %
SWZNF100%
N/A
IBWC - SWZNF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TVLF - SWZNF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PTBRY - SWZNF
21%
Poorly correlated
-13.19%
BMA - SWZNF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.16%
TDCB - SWZNF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More