PSYTF
Price
$8.71
Change
+$0.03 (+0.35%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
676.83M
SBOEF
Price
$30.56
Change
-$1.59 (-4.95%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
497.14M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PSYTF vs SBOEF

Header iconPSYTF vs SBOEF Comparison
Open Charts PSYTF vs SBOEFBanner chart's image
Pason Systems
Price$8.71
Change+$0.03 (+0.35%)
Volume$7.04K
Capitalization676.83M
SBO AG
Price$30.56
Change-$1.59 (-4.95%)
Volume$901
Capitalization497.14M
PSYTF vs SBOEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PSYTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBOEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PSYTF vs. SBOEF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSYTF is a Buy and SBOEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (PSYTF: $8.71 vs. SBOEF: $30.56)
Brand notoriety: PSYTF and SBOEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PSYTF: 31% vs. SBOEF: 141%
Market capitalization -- PSYTF: $676.83M vs. SBOEF: $497.14M
PSYTF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $676.83M. SBOEF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $497.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $53.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PSYTF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSBOEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PSYTF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SBOEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PSYTF is a better buy in the long-term than SBOEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PSYTF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBOEF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PSYTF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SBOEF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PSYTF is a better buy in the short-term than SBOEF.

Price Growth

PSYTF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +0.76% price change this week, while SBOEF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -4.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.16%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+2.52% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PSYTF($677M) has a higher market cap than SBOEF($497M). PSYTF has higher P/E ratio than SBOEF: PSYTF (13.01) vs SBOEF (10.49). PSYTF YTD gains are higher at: -7.146 vs. SBOEF (-38.387). PSYTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 154M vs. SBOEF (102M). SBOEF has more cash in the bank: 279M vs. PSYTF (69.3M). PSYTF has less debt than SBOEF: PSYTF (15.1M) vs SBOEF (373M). SBOEF has higher revenues than PSYTF: SBOEF (526M) vs PSYTF (423M).
PSYTFSBOEFPSYTF / SBOEF
Capitalization677M497M136%
EBITDA154M102M151%
Gain YTD-7.146-38.38719%
P/E Ratio13.0110.49124%
Revenue423M526M80%
Total Cash69.3M279M25%
Total Debt15.1M373M4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PSYTF vs SBOEF: Fundamental Ratings
PSYTF
SBOEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5993
SMR RATING
1..100
5475
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5983
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1652
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a26

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBOEF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as PSYTF (22). This means that SBOEF’s stock grew similarly to PSYTF’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBOEF (93). This means that PSYTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBOEF’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as SBOEF (75). This means that PSYTF’s stock grew similarly to SBOEF’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as SBOEF (83). This means that PSYTF’s stock grew similarly to SBOEF’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBOEF (52). This means that PSYTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBOEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PSYTFSBOEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
15%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
57%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PSYTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBOEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OSGIX43.610.39
+0.90%
JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth A
JEASX17.840.11
+0.62%
Janus Henderson Global Sust Eq A
OSPPX6.590.04
+0.61%
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus R6
IEOTX16.310.09
+0.55%
Voya Large Cap Growth Port S2
FRBAX30.330.14
+0.46%
JHancock Regional Bank A

PSYTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PSYTF and NGS have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSYTF and NGS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSYTF
1D Price
Change %
PSYTF100%
N/A
NGS - PSYTF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
SUBCY - PSYTF
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.65%
SBOEY - PSYTF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCCRF - PSYTF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
QSEP - PSYTF
5%
Poorly correlated
-8.42%
More

SBOEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBOEF and SBOEY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBOEF and SBOEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBOEF
1D Price
Change %
SBOEF100%
N/A
SBOEY - SBOEF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SAPMY - SBOEF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSYTF - SBOEF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUBCY - SBOEF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.65%
SBFFY - SBOEF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
More