PSYTF
Price
$8.71
Change
+$0.03 (+0.35%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
676.83M
QSEP
Price
$0.24
Change
-$0.03 (-11.11%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
128.65M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PSYTF vs QSEP

Header iconPSYTF vs QSEP Comparison
Open Charts PSYTF vs QSEPBanner chart's image
Pason Systems
Price$8.71
Change+$0.03 (+0.35%)
Volume$7.04K
Capitalization676.83M
QS Energy
Price$0.24
Change-$0.03 (-11.11%)
Volume$328.71K
Capitalization128.65M
PSYTF vs QSEP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PSYTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QSEP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PSYTF vs. QSEP commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSYTF is a Buy and QSEP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (PSYTF: $8.71 vs. QSEP: $0.24)
Brand notoriety: PSYTF and QSEP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PSYTF: 31% vs. QSEP: 236%
Market capitalization -- PSYTF: $676.83M vs. QSEP: $128.65M
PSYTF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $676.83M. QSEP’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $128.65M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $53.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PSYTF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileQSEP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PSYTF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • QSEP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PSYTF is a better buy in the long-term than QSEP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PSYTF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QSEP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PSYTF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • QSEP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PSYTF is a better buy in the short-term than QSEP.

Price Growth

PSYTF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +0.76% price change this week, while QSEP (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -8.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.16%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+2.52% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PSYTF($677M) has a higher market cap than QSEP($129M). QSEP YTD gains are higher at: 63.200 vs. PSYTF (-7.146). PSYTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 154M vs. QSEP (-12.51M). PSYTF has more cash in the bank: 69.3M vs. QSEP (778K). QSEP has less debt than PSYTF: QSEP (1.38M) vs PSYTF (15.1M). PSYTF has higher revenues than QSEP: PSYTF (423M) vs QSEP (0).
PSYTFQSEPPSYTF / QSEP
Capitalization677M129M525%
EBITDA154M-12.51M-1,231%
Gain YTD-7.14663.200-11%
P/E Ratio13.01N/A-
Revenue423M0-
Total Cash69.3M778K8,907%
Total Debt15.1M1.38M1,094%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PSYTF vs QSEP: Fundamental Ratings
PSYTF
QSEP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5945
SMR RATING
1..100
54100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5940
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
16100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PSYTF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for QSEP (97). This means that PSYTF’s stock grew significantly faster than QSEP’s over the last 12 months.

QSEP's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as PSYTF (59). This means that QSEP’s stock grew similarly to PSYTF’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QSEP (100). This means that PSYTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QSEP’s over the last 12 months.

QSEP's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as PSYTF (59). This means that QSEP’s stock grew similarly to PSYTF’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for QSEP (100). This means that PSYTF’s stock grew significantly faster than QSEP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PSYTFQSEP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PSYTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QSEP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OSGIX43.610.39
+0.90%
JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth A
JEASX17.840.11
+0.62%
Janus Henderson Global Sust Eq A
OSPPX6.590.04
+0.61%
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus R6
IEOTX16.310.09
+0.55%
Voya Large Cap Growth Port S2
FRBAX30.330.14
+0.46%
JHancock Regional Bank A

PSYTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PSYTF and NGS have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSYTF and NGS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSYTF
1D Price
Change %
PSYTF100%
N/A
NGS - PSYTF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
SUBCY - PSYTF
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.65%
SBOEY - PSYTF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCCRF - PSYTF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
QSEP - PSYTF
5%
Poorly correlated
-8.42%
More

QSEP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QSEP and ATONY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QSEP and ATONY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QSEP
1D Price
Change %
QSEP100%
-8.42%
ATONY - QSEP
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PDER - QSEP
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBFFF - QSEP
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSYTF - QSEP
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCCRF - QSEP
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
More