PSYTF
Price
$9.46
Change
+$0.06 (+0.64%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
799.65M
QSEP
Price
$0.20
Change
+$0.01 (+5.26%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
23.82M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PSYTF vs QSEP

Header iconPSYTF vs QSEP Comparison
Open Charts PSYTF vs QSEPBanner chart's image
Pason Systems
Price$9.46
Change+$0.06 (+0.64%)
Volume$4.4K
Capitalization799.65M
QS Energy
Price$0.20
Change+$0.01 (+5.26%)
Volume$272.85K
Capitalization23.82M
PSYTF vs QSEP Comparison Chart
Loading...
QSEP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PSYTF vs. QSEP commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSYTF is a Hold and QSEP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (PSYTF: $9.46 vs. QSEP: $0.20)
Brand notoriety: PSYTF and QSEP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PSYTF: 25% vs. QSEP: 97%
Market capitalization -- PSYTF: $799.65M vs. QSEP: $23.82M
PSYTF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $799.65M. QSEP’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $23.82M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PSYTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQSEP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PSYTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QSEP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PSYTF is a better buy in the long-term than QSEP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QSEP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • QSEP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

PSYTF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +5.11% price change this week, while QSEP (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +21.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +5.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+5.43% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PSYTF($800M) has a higher market cap than QSEP($23.8M). QSEP YTD gains are higher at: 33.333 vs. PSYTF (0.896). PSYTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 168M vs. QSEP (-1.2M). PSYTF has more cash in the bank: 185M vs. QSEP (107K). QSEP has less debt than PSYTF: QSEP (1.91M) vs PSYTF (13.2M). PSYTF has higher revenues than QSEP: PSYTF (359M) vs QSEP (0).
PSYTFQSEPPSYTF / QSEP
Capitalization800M23.8M3,361%
EBITDA168M-1.2M-14,000%
Gain YTD0.89633.3333%
P/E Ratio8.88N/A-
Revenue359M0-
Total Cash185M107K172,897%
Total Debt13.2M1.91M690%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PSYTF vs QSEP: Fundamental Ratings
PSYTF
QSEP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5052
SMR RATING
1..100
55100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5135
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
17100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PSYTF's Valuation (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QSEP (97). This means that PSYTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QSEP’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as QSEP (52). This means that PSYTF’s stock grew similarly to QSEP’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QSEP (100). This means that PSYTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QSEP’s over the last 12 months.

QSEP's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as PSYTF (51). This means that QSEP’s stock grew similarly to PSYTF’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for QSEP (100). This means that PSYTF’s stock grew significantly faster than QSEP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QSEP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QSEP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMRAX10.08-0.05
-0.49%
Calamos Merger Arbitrage A
VVJEX11.18-0.13
-1.15%
Voya VACS Series MCV Fund
JMVNX14.58-0.25
-1.69%
JHFunds2 Mid Value NAV
EWMCX36.33-0.63
-1.70%
Evercore Equity
WMGRX22.82-0.47
-2.02%
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth R

PSYTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PSYTF and NGS have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSYTF and NGS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSYTF
1D Price
Change %
PSYTF100%
+0.64%
NGS - PSYTF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
SUBCY - PSYTF
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
SBOEY - PSYTF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCCRF - PSYTF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
QSEP - PSYTF
5%
Poorly correlated
+5.26%
More

QSEP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QSEP and ATONY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QSEP and ATONY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QSEP
1D Price
Change %
QSEP100%
+5.26%
ATONY - QSEP
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PDER - QSEP
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBFFF - QSEP
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
PSYTF - QSEP
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
MCCRF - QSEP
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
More