Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSVKX vs WCMFX
PSVKX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts PSVKX vs WCMFX
PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Val R4
Price$19.49
Change-$0.37 (-1.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets397.36M
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$3.62
Change-$0.04 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.41M
PSVKX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSVKX vs. WCMFX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSVKX is a Buy and WCMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PSVKX has more cash in the bank: 397M vs. WCMFX (2.41M). PSVKX pays higher dividends than WCMFX: PSVKX (1.25) vs WCMFX (0.00). PSVKX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: PSVKX (8 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). PSVKX (36.05) is less costly to investors than WCMFX (1.45). PSVKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. WCMFX (15.00). PSVKX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMFX: PSVKX (0) vs WCMFX (100000). PSVKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.04 vs. WCMFX (-71.41). PSVKX return over 5 years is better than : 34.53 vs. WCMFX (-64.40).
| PSVKX | WCMFX | PSVKX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.90 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 36.05 | 1.45 | 2,486% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.237 | -69.449 | -25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 397M | 2.41M | 16,494% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.04 | -71.41 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.61 | -64.01 | -6% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.53 | -64.40 | -54% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement