Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSTIX vs RYCBX
PSTIX vs RYCBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSTIX vs. RYCBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSTIX is a Hold and RYCBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PSTIX has more cash in the bank: 82.5M vs. RYCBX (8.53M). RYCBX pays higher dividends than PSTIX: RYCBX (6.64) vs PSTIX (0.00). PSTIX was incepted earlier than RYCBX: PSTIX (23 years) vs RYCBX (25 years). RYCBX (2.60) is less costly to investors than PSTIX (0.73). RYCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSTIX: RYCBX (2500) vs PSTIX (1000000). PSTIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.76 vs. RYCBX (-26.45). PSTIX return over 5 years is better than : -33.44 vs. RYCBX (-76.50).
| PSTIX | RYCBX | PSTIX / RYCBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 2.51 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 2.60 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.457 | -1.690 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 82.5M | 8.53M | 968% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 6.64 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.76 | -26.45 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | -24.75 | -64.78 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.44 | -76.50 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | -67.92 | -97.21 | 70% |