Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSSCX vs RYCBX
PSSCX vs RYCBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSSCX vs. RYCBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSSCX is a Hold and RYCBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PSSCX has more cash in the bank: 82.5M vs. RYCBX (8.53M). RYCBX pays higher dividends than PSSCX: RYCBX (6.64) vs PSSCX (0.00). PSSCX was incepted earlier than RYCBX: PSSCX (20 years) vs RYCBX (25 years). RYCBX (2.60) is less costly to investors than PSSCX (1.88). PSSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCBX: PSSCX (1000) vs RYCBX (2500). PSSCX (1000) and RYCBX (1000) have similar IRA initial investment minimum. PSSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.71 vs. RYCBX (-26.45). PSSCX return over 5 years is better than : -37.23 vs. RYCBX (-76.50).
| PSSCX | RYCBX | PSSCX / RYCBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 2.51 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 2.60 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.702 | -1.690 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 82.5M | 8.53M | 968% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 6.64 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.71 | -26.45 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | -27.22 | -64.78 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.23 | -76.50 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | -71.42 | -97.21 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement