Advertisement
PSQH vs RUM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSQH is a StrongBuy and RUM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PSQH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRUM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- PSQH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- RUM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PSQH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PSQH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- RUM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
PSQH (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.02% price change this week, while RUM (@Internet Software/Services) price change was -2.23% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.31%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was -0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.09%.
Reported Earning Dates
RUM is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.10% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Internet Software/Services (-0.79% weekly)Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
| PSQH | RUM | PSQH / RUM | |
| Capitalization | 90.6M | 2.67B | 3% |
| EBITDA | -42.33M | -116.03M | 36% |
| Gain YTD | -56.167 | -39.431 | 142% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 26.5M | 101M | 26% |
| Total Cash | 28M | 301M | 9% |
| Total Debt | 32.4M | 1.56M | 2,077% |
| PSQH | RUM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 41% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 45% | 4 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 39% | 4 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 31% | 4 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 22 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 19% | 4 days ago 81% |
Advertisement
PSQH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSQH has been loosely correlated with RUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PSQH jumps, then RUM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PSQH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSQH | 100% | -0.50% | ||
| RUM - PSQH | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.11% | ||
| PRCH - PSQH | 32% Poorly correlated | -4.63% | ||
| NCCGF - PSQH | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| REKR - PSQH | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.85% | ||
| NATL - PSQH | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.72% | ||
More | ||||
RUM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUM has been loosely correlated with BTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RUM jumps, then BTDR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUM | 100% | -2.11% | ||
| BTDR - RUM | 40% Loosely correlated | -2.86% | ||
| YELP - RUM | 38% Loosely correlated | -9.22% | ||
| EVCM - RUM | 37% Loosely correlated | -3.72% | ||
| AISP - RUM | 37% Loosely correlated | +2.13% | ||
| AI - RUM | 36% Loosely correlated | -4.82% | ||
More | ||||