Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSQGX vs RLBAX
PSQGX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts PSQGX vs RLBAX
Port Street Quality Growth Institutional
Price$18.43
Change+$0.04 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets188.4M
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.14
Change+$0.10 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.75B
PSQGX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSQGX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSQGX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. PSQGX (188M). PSQGX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: PSQGX (1.66) vs RLBAX (1.15). PSQGX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: PSQGX (12 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than PSQGX (1.10). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. PSQGX (7.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSQGX: RLBAX (250) vs PSQGX (2000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.27 vs. PSQGX (3.01). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.00 vs. PSQGX (29.48).
| PSQGX | RLBAX | PSQGX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.31 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.31 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.655 | 12.531 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 188M | 263B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 1.15 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.01 | 7.27 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.58 | 48.19 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.48 | 40.00 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.84 | 74.51 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement