Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSPLX vs RYCDX
PSPLX vs RYCDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSPLX vs. RYCDX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSPLX is a Hold and RYCDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PSPLX has more cash in the bank: 82.5M vs. RYCDX (10.3M). RYCDX pays higher dividends than PSPLX: RYCDX (13.65) vs PSPLX (0.00). PSPLX was incepted earlier than RYCDX: PSPLX (16 years) vs RYCDX (25 years). RYCDX (2.73) is less costly to investors than PSPLX (0.83). RYCDX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSPLX: RYCDX (2500) vs PSPLX (1000000). PSPLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.80 vs. RYCDX (-34.44). PSPLX return over 5 years is better than : -33.79 vs. RYCDX (-84.13).
| PSPLX | RYCDX | PSPLX / RYCDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 2.63 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 2.73 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.612 | -0.432 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 82.5M | 10.3M | 801% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 13.65 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.80 | -34.44 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | -24.96 | -78.82 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.79 | -84.13 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | -68.25 | -99.34 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement