Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSPLX vs RYCBX
PSPLX vs RYCBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSPLX vs. RYCBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSPLX is a Hold and RYCBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PSPLX has more cash in the bank: 82.5M vs. RYCBX (8.53M). RYCBX pays higher dividends than PSPLX: RYCBX (6.64) vs PSPLX (0.00). PSPLX was incepted earlier than RYCBX: PSPLX (16 years) vs RYCBX (25 years). RYCBX (2.60) is less costly to investors than PSPLX (0.83). RYCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSPLX: RYCBX (2500) vs PSPLX (1000000). PSPLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.57 vs. RYCBX (-24.62). PSPLX return over 5 years is better than : -33.11 vs. RYCBX (-76.06).
| PSPLX | RYCBX | PSPLX / RYCBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 2.51 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 2.60 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | -0.669 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 82.5M | 8.53M | 968% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 6.64 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.57 | -24.62 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | -24.50 | -64.41 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.11 | -76.06 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | -68.06 | -97.18 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement