Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSOAX vs UBVVX
PSOAX vs UBVVX Comparison
Open Charts PSOAX vs UBVVX
JPMorgan Small Cap Value A
Price$27.36
Change+$1.03 (+3.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.26B
Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Val R5
Price$82.18
Change-$2.64 (-3.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.97B
PSOAX vs UBVVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSOAX vs. UBVVX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSOAX is a Buy and UBVVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UBVVX has more cash in the bank: 8.97B vs. PSOAX (1.26B). UBVVX pays higher dividends than PSOAX: UBVVX (1.73) vs PSOAX (0.72). PSOAX was incepted earlier than UBVVX: PSOAX (31 years) vs UBVVX (9 years). PSOAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than UBVVX (0.94). PSOAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. UBVVX (35.00). UBVVX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSOAX: UBVVX (0) vs PSOAX (1000). PSOAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.50 vs. UBVVX (-1.54). UBVVX return over 5 years is better than : 25.41 vs. PSOAX (2.21).
| PSOAX | UBVVX | PSOAX / UBVVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.90 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.94 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.787 | 5.130 | 171% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 8.97B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 1.73 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.50 | -1.54 | -683% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.63 | 4.94 | 296% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.21 | 25.41 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement