PSMMY
Price
$33.89
Change
+$0.33 (+0.98%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.76B
SKHSF
Price
$21.78
Change
+$0.05 (+0.23%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
13.44B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PSMMY vs SKHSF

Header iconPSMMY vs SKHSF Comparison
Open Charts PSMMY vs SKHSFBanner chart's image
Persimmon
Price$33.89
Change+$0.33 (+0.98%)
Volume$4.67K
Capitalization4.76B
Sekisui House
Price$21.78
Change+$0.05 (+0.23%)
Volume$161
Capitalization13.44B
PSMMY vs SKHSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PSMMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SKHSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PSMMY vs. SKHSF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSMMY is a Hold and SKHSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (PSMMY: $33.89 vs. SKHSF: $21.78)
Brand notoriety: PSMMY and SKHSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Homebuilding industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PSMMY: 52% vs. SKHSF: 8%
Market capitalization -- PSMMY: $4.76B vs. SKHSF: $13.44B
PSMMY [@Homebuilding] is valued at $4.76B. SKHSF’s [@Homebuilding] market capitalization is $13.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Homebuilding] industry ranges from $53.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Homebuilding] industry is $7.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PSMMY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSKHSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PSMMY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SKHSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PSMMY is a better buy in the long-term than SKHSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PSMMY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SKHSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PSMMY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SKHSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both PSMMY and SKHSF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

PSMMY (@Homebuilding) experienced а -8.41% price change this week, while SKHSF (@Homebuilding) price change was +4.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was +0.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.63%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Homebuilding (+0.59% weekly)

Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SKHSF($13.4B) has a higher market cap than PSMMY($4.76B). SKHSF has higher P/E ratio than PSMMY: SKHSF (11.40) vs PSMMY (6.57). PSMMY YTD gains are higher at: 16.371 vs. SKHSF (-13.142). SKHSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 253B vs. PSMMY (751M). SKHSF has higher revenues than PSMMY: SKHSF (2.89T) vs PSMMY (3.82B).
PSMMYSKHSFPSMMY / SKHSF
Capitalization4.76B13.4B36%
EBITDA751M253B0%
Gain YTD16.371-13.142-125%
P/E Ratio6.5711.4058%
Revenue3.82B2.89T0%
Total CashN/A303B-
Total DebtN/A654B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PSMMY vs SKHSF: Fundamental Ratings
PSMMY
SKHSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10068
SMR RATING
1..100
5157
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5061
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7765
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PSMMY's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as SKHSF (16). This means that PSMMY’s stock grew similarly to SKHSF’s over the last 12 months.

SKHSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as PSMMY (100). This means that SKHSF’s stock grew similarly to PSMMY’s over the last 12 months.

PSMMY's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as SKHSF (57). This means that PSMMY’s stock grew similarly to SKHSF’s over the last 12 months.

PSMMY's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as SKHSF (61). This means that PSMMY’s stock grew similarly to SKHSF’s over the last 12 months.

SKHSF's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as PSMMY (77). This means that SKHSF’s stock grew similarly to PSMMY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PSMMYSKHSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
42%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
71%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PSMMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SKHSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PEJ57.810.31
+0.54%
Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entmnt ETF
ILF26.640.13
+0.49%
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
INOV32.260.04
+0.14%
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF - Nov
SLNZ47.220.02
+0.03%
TCW Senior Loan ETF
ONEO124.56N/A
N/A
SPDR® Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF

PSMMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSMMY has been closely correlated with BTDPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PSMMY jumps, then BTDPY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSMMY
1D Price
Change %
PSMMY100%
+0.98%
BTDPY - PSMMY
68%
Closely correlated
+0.38%
KBH - PSMMY
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.85%
CCS - PSMMY
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.26%
TWODY - PSMMY
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
PHM - PSMMY
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.53%
More

SKHSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SKHSF and SKHSY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SKHSF and SKHSY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SKHSF
1D Price
Change %
SKHSF100%
+0.27%
SKHSY - SKHSF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
DFH - SKHSF
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.68%
PSMMY - SKHSF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
TWODY - SKHSF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
TWODF - SKHSF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More