Advertisement
PSMMY vs SKHSF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSMMY is a Hold and SKHSF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PSMMY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSKHSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PSMMY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SKHSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PSMMY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SKHSF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PSMMY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SKHSF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
PSMMY (@Homebuilding) experienced а +3.80% price change this week, while SKHSF (@Homebuilding) price change was +4.30% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was +6.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.22%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Homebuilding (+6.37% weekly)Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.
| PSMMY | SKHSF | PSMMY / SKHSF | |
| Capitalization | 4.76B | 15.2B | 31% |
| EBITDA | 406M | 322B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | 6.329 | -2.919 | -217% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.02 | 11.85 | 118% |
| Revenue | 3.39B | 4.18T | 0% |
| Total Cash | 123M | 310B | 0% |
| Total Debt | N/A | 1.98T | - |
PSMMY | SKHSF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 10 Undervalued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 57 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 83 | 61 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | 37 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PSMMY's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as SKHSF (16). This means that PSMMY’s stock grew similarly to SKHSF’s over the last 12 months.
SKHSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PSMMY (100). This means that SKHSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PSMMY’s over the last 12 months.
SKHSF's SMR Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as PSMMY (83). This means that SKHSF’s stock grew similarly to PSMMY’s over the last 12 months.
SKHSF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as PSMMY (63). This means that SKHSF’s stock grew similarly to PSMMY’s over the last 12 months.
SKHSF's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PSMMY (85). This means that SKHSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PSMMY’s over the last 12 months.
| PSMMY | SKHSF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 43% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 73% | 22 days ago 35% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 47% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 48% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FSGS | 31.69 | 0.11 | +0.35% |
| First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF | |||
| VFMV | 131.13 | 0.27 | +0.21% |
| Vanguard US Minimum Volatility ETF | |||
| MARW | 33.30 | 0.04 | +0.11% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Large Cp Buffer20 Mar ETF | |||
| JOJO | 15.33 | N/A | +0.01% |
| ATAC Credit Rotation ETF | |||
| HYS | 95.27 | -0.10 | -0.10% |
| PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corp Bd ETF | |||
PSMMY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSMMY has been closely correlated with BTDPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PSMMY jumps, then BTDPY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PSMMY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSMMY | 100% | +1.15% | ||
| BTDPY - PSMMY | 68% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| KBH - PSMMY | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| TWODY - PSMMY | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| PHM - PSMMY | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| LEN - PSMMY | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
More | ||||
SKHSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SKHSF and SKHSY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SKHSF and SKHSY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SKHSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SKHSF | 100% | +3.31% | ||
| SKHSY - SKHSF | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.68% | ||
| DFH - SKHSF | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
| PSMMY - SKHSF | 8% Poorly correlated | +1.15% | ||
| TWODY - SKHSF | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.64% | ||
| TWODF - SKHSF | 2% Poorly correlated | +13.82% | ||
More | ||||