Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSLGX vs RGACX
PSLGX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts PSLGX vs RGACX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders R6
Price$144.75
Change-$0.66 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.44B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
PSLGX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSLGX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSLGX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. PSLGX (6.44B). PSLGX pays higher dividends than RGACX: PSLGX (0.67) vs RGACX (0.07). PSLGX was incepted earlier than RGACX: PSLGX (7 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than PSLGX (0.53). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PSLGX (22.00). PSLGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: PSLGX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.08 vs. PSLGX (-0.53). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.95 vs. PSLGX (26.32).
| PSLGX | RGACX | PSLGX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.94 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.94 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.823 | 14.044 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.44B | 329B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.07 | 932% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.53 | 14.08 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.61 | 41.19 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.32 | 41.95 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 83.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement