Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSLCX vs SSGSX
PSLCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PSLCX vs SSGSX
Putnam Small Cap Value C
Price$10.75
Change+$0.07 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets267.76M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.47
Change+$0.28 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.82B
PSLCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSLCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSLCX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.82B vs. PSLCX (268M). PSLCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PSLCX (0.71) vs SSGSX (0.51). PSLCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PSLCX (26 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). PSLCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). PSLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). PSLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: PSLCX (500) vs SSGSX (2500). PSLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.50 vs. SSGSX (-1.26). PSLCX return over 5 years is better than : 80.58 vs. SSGSX (29.33).
| PSLCX | SSGSX | PSLCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.26 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.26 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.607 | -2.068 | -78% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 2500 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 268M | 5.82B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.51 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.50 | -1.26 | -119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.17 | 2.38 | 469% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.58 | 29.33 | 275% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.49 | 16.52 | -94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers