Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSLCX vs SSGSX
PSLCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PSLCX vs SSGSX
Putnam Small Cap Value C
Price$9.96
Change-$0.23 (-2.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.1M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$42.53
Change-$0.78 (-1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.52B
PSLCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSLCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSLCX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.52B vs. PSLCX (248M). PSLCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PSLCX (0.74) vs SSGSX (0.52). PSLCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PSLCX (26 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). PSLCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). PSLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). PSLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: PSLCX (500) vs SSGSX (2500). PSLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.89 vs. SSGSX (-8.36). PSLCX return over 5 years is better than : 70.12 vs. SSGSX (21.72).
| PSLCX | SSGSX | PSLCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.26 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.26 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.860 | -8.400 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 2500 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 248M | 5.52B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.52 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.89 | -8.36 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.32 | -3.90 | -8% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.12 | 21.72 | 323% |
| Returns for 10 years | -23.08 | 7.10 | -325% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement