Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSIL vs TAN
PSIL vs TAN Comparison
Open Charts PSIL vs TAN
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF
Price$14.44
Change+$0.03 (+0.21%)
Volume$4.94K
Net Assets10.82M
Invesco Solar ETF
Price$38.73
Change+$1.69 (+4.56%)
Volume$1.96M
Net Assets680.62M
PSIL vs TAN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSIL vs. TAN commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSIL is a Hold and TAN is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TAN has more net assets: 681M vs. PSIL (10.8M). PSIL has a higher annual dividend yield than TAN: PSIL (33.359) vs TAN (16.938). PSIL was incepted earlier than TAN: PSIL (4 years) vs TAN (17 years). TAN (0.71) has a lower expense ratio than PSIL (0.99). PSIL has a higher turnover TAN (43.00) vs TAN (43.00).
| PSIL | TAN | PSIL / TAN | |
| Gain YTD | 33.359 | 16.938 | 197% |
| Net Assets | 10.8M | 681M | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.71 | 139% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 43.00 | 160% |
| Yield | 2.46 | 0.48 | 510% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 17 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PSIL | TAN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
PSIL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSIL has been loosely correlated with MNMD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PSIL jumps, then MNMD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PSIL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSIL | 100% | +0.19% | ||
| MNMD - PSIL | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| ATAI - PSIL | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| CYBN - PSIL | 35% Loosely correlated | +7.59% | ||
| CMPS - PSIL | 32% Poorly correlated | -3.55% | ||
| CMND - PSIL | 24% Poorly correlated | +21.82% | ||
More | ||||
TAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAN has been closely correlated with CSIQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TAN jumps, then CSIQ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAN | 100% | +4.56% | ||
| CSIQ - TAN | 78% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| FSLR - TAN | 77% Closely correlated | +8.51% | ||
| SEDG - TAN | 75% Closely correlated | +16.69% | ||
| RUN - TAN | 73% Closely correlated | +16.80% | ||
| ENPH - TAN | 70% Closely correlated | +3.91% | ||
More | ||||