PSHG
Price
$1.96
Change
-$0.03 (-1.51%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
24.37M
SFL
Price
$7.67
Change
+$0.01 (+0.13%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.02B
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PSHG vs SFL

Header iconPSHG vs SFL Comparison
Open Charts PSHG vs SFLBanner chart's image
Performance Shipping
Price$1.96
Change-$0.03 (-1.51%)
Volume$43.2K
Capitalization24.37M
SFL
Price$7.67
Change+$0.01 (+0.13%)
Volume$1.23M
Capitalization1.02B
PSHG vs SFL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PSHG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PSHG vs. SFL commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSHG is a Buy and SFL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (PSHG: $1.96 vs. SFL: $7.67)
Brand notoriety: PSHG and SFL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PSHG: 40% vs. SFL: 90%
Market capitalization -- PSHG: $24.37M vs. SFL: $1.02B
PSHG [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $24.37M. SFL’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $1.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $30.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PSHG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PSHG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SFL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PSHG is a better buy in the long-term than SFL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PSHG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PSHG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PSHG is a better buy in the short-term than SFL.

Price Growth

PSHG (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +5.95% price change this week, while SFL (@Marine Shipping) price change was -2.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

SFL is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (-1.03% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFL($1.02B) has a higher market cap than PSHG($24.4M). SFL has higher P/E ratio than PSHG: SFL (18.71) vs PSHG (1.26). PSHG YTD gains are higher at: 5.376 vs. SFL (-18.097). PSHG has less debt than SFL: PSHG (43.7M) vs SFL (2.82B).
PSHGSFLPSHG / SFL
Capitalization24.4M1.02B2%
EBITDA60.8MN/A-
Gain YTD5.376-18.097-30%
P/E Ratio1.2618.717%
Revenue84MN/A-
Total Cash96.8MN/A-
Total Debt43.7M2.82B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PSHG vs SFL: Fundamental Ratings
PSHG
SFL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1166
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10071
SMR RATING
1..100
4363
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4877
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5113
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4311

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SFL's Valuation (7) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as PSHG (21) in the null industry. This means that SFL’s stock grew similarly to PSHG’s over the last 12 months.

SFL's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as PSHG (100) in the null industry. This means that SFL’s stock grew similarly to PSHG’s over the last 12 months.

PSHG's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as SFL (63) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that PSHG’s stock grew similarly to SFL’s over the last 12 months.

PSHG's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as SFL (77) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that PSHG’s stock grew similarly to SFL’s over the last 12 months.

SFL's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PSHG (51) in the null industry. This means that SFL’s stock grew somewhat faster than PSHG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PSHGSFL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PSHG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MNDKX33.580.34
+1.02%
MFS New Discovery R6
DFSIX51.060.35
+0.69%
DFA US Sustainability Core 1
SBSPX51.610.30
+0.58%
Franklin S&P 500 Index A
NWZNX22.320.11
+0.50%
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr Instl Svc
SUTCX16.550.08
+0.49%
AB Sustainable US Thematic C

PSHG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PSHG and ECO have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSHG and ECO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSHG
1D Price
Change %
PSHG100%
-1.51%
ECO - PSHG
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
DAC - PSHG
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
GASS - PSHG
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.17%
SFL - PSHG
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
BWLP - PSHG
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
More

SFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFL has been loosely correlated with GNK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SFL jumps, then GNK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFL
1D Price
Change %
SFL100%
+0.13%
GNK - SFL
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
ECO - SFL
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
ASC - SFL
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
CMRE - SFL
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.73%
PANL - SFL
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
More