Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSEPX vs RMFCX
PSEPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PSEPX vs RMFCX
1789 Growth and Income P
Price$19.96
Change+$0.13 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.4M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.27
Change+$0.38 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.43B
PSEPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSEPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSEPX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. PSEPX (32.4M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PSEPX: RMFCX (1.24) vs PSEPX (1.10). PSEPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PSEPX (12 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PSEPX (1.03) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PSEPX (20.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSEPX: RMFCX (250) vs PSEPX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.41 vs. PSEPX (5.96). RMFCX (63.20) and PSEPX (60.59) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PSEPX | RMFCX | PSEPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.91 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.91 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.081 | 13.245 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.4M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.24 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.96 | 6.41 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.55 | 42.10 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.59 | 63.20 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.27 | 103.62 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement