Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSEPX vs RMFCX
PSEPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PSEPX vs RMFCX
1789 Growth and Income P
Price$19.31
Change+$0.10 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.11M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
PSEPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSEPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSEPX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. PSEPX (32.1M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PSEPX: RMFCX (1.27) vs PSEPX (1.13). PSEPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PSEPX (12 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PSEPX (1.03) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PSEPX (20.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSEPX: RMFCX (250) vs PSEPX (2000). PSEPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.79 vs. RMFCX (11.47). PSEPX (62.37) and RMFCX (61.83) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PSEPX | RMFCX | PSEPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.91 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.91 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.496 | 9.596 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.1M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 1.27 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.79 | 11.47 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.95 | 29.27 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.37 | 61.83 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.07 | 79.21 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement