Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSEPX vs RMFCX
PSEPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PSEPX vs RMFCX
1789 Growth and Income P
Price$20.10
Change+$0.20 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.75M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.96
Change+$0.31 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
PSEPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSEPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSEPX is a Buy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. PSEPX (32.8M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PSEPX: RMFCX (1.18) vs PSEPX (1.07). PSEPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PSEPX (12 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). PSEPX (1.03) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PSEPX (20.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSEPX: RMFCX (250) vs PSEPX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.82 vs. PSEPX (4.20). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.87 vs. PSEPX (50.25).
| PSEPX | RMFCX | PSEPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.91 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.91 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.039 | 16.369 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.8M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.18 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.20 | 8.82 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.01 | 30.01 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.25 | 54.87 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.40 | 97.71 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement